-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 25.1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[DOCS] Rolling upgrade with old internal indices #37184
[DOCS] Rolling upgrade with old internal indices #37184
Conversation
Pinging @elastic/es-docs |
@@ -18,6 +18,12 @@ you can do a rolling upgrade you must encrypt the internode-communication with | |||
SSL/TLS, which requires a full cluster restart. For more information about this | |||
requirement and the associated bootstrap check, see <<bootstrap-checks-tls>>. | |||
|
|||
WARNING: The format used for the internal indices used by Kibana and {xpack} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
In general, we're trying to get away from using "X-Pack" terminology. It hasn't been cleaned up everywhere yet, but if we can use something else here, that would be great. Would it be correct to say something like "the Elastic Stack commercial features" instead?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, I am aware that the lingo had changed, but this is a warning message for users of 5.6 when X-Pack is still referred. Moreover, the proper stack upgrade docs in https://www.elastic.co/guide/en/elastic-stack/current/upgrading-elastic-stack.html, where the internal index upgrade step is described, still mention "X-Pack". I think using a different terminology would be confusing in this circumstance.
The decision is yours though, "The format used for the internal indices used by commercial features has changed in 6.x .", sounds equally fine to me.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
You're right, I cleaned up some occurrences of X-Pack in that book yesterday, but there are still lots that seem relevant. This seems like one of those cases.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
Upgrading the Elastic Stack perfectly documents the process to upgrade ES from 5 to 6 when internal indices are present. However, the rolling upgrade docs do not mention anything about internal indices. This adds a warning in the rolling upgrade procedure, highlighting that internal indices should be upgraded before the rolling upgrade procedure can be started.
Upgrading the Elastic Stack perfectly documents the process to upgrade ES from 5 to 6 when internal indices are present. However, the rolling upgrade docs do not mention anything about internal indices. This adds a warning in the rolling upgrade procedure, highlighting that internal indices should be upgraded before the rolling upgrade procedure can be started.
Upgrading the Elastic Stack perfectly documents the process to upgrade ES from 5 to 6 when internal indices are present. However, the rolling upgrade docs do not mention anything about internal indices. This adds a warning in the rolling upgrade procedure, highlighting that internal indices should be upgraded before the rolling upgrade procedure can be started.
Upgrading the Elastic Stack perfectly documents the process to upgrade ES from 5 to 6 when internal indices are present. However, the rolling upgrade docs do not mention anything about internal indices. This adds a warning in the rolling upgrade procedure, highlighting that internal indices should be upgraded before the rolling upgrade procedure can be started.
Upgrading the Elastic Stack perfectly documents the process to upgrade ES from 5 to 6 when internal indices are present. However, the rolling upgrade docs do not mention anything about internal indices. This adds a warning in the rolling upgrade procedure, highlighting that internal indices should be upgraded before the rolling upgrade procedure can be started.
Upgrading the Elastic Stack perfectly documents the process to upgrade ES from 5 to 6 when internal indices are present. However, the rolling upgrade docs do not mention anything about internal indices. This adds a warning in the rolling upgrade procedure, highlighting that internal indices should be upgraded before the rolling upgrade procedure can be started.
Upgrading the Elastic Stack perfectly documents the process to upgrade ES from 5 to 6 when internal indices are present. However, the rolling upgrade docs do not mention anything about internal indices. This adds a warning in the rolling upgrade procedure, highlighting that internal indices should be upgraded before the rolling upgrade procedure can be started.
Upgrading the Elastic Stack perfectly documents the process to upgrade ES from 5 to 6 when internal indices are present. However, the rolling upgrade docs do not mention anything about internal indices. This adds a warning in the rolling upgrade procedure, highlighting that internal indices should be upgraded before the rolling upgrade procedure can be started.
Upgrading the Elastic Stack perfectly documents the process to upgrade ES from 5 to 6 when internal indices are present. However, the rolling upgrade docs do not mention anything about internal indices.
This adds a warning in the rolling upgrade procedure, highlighting that internal indices should be upgraded before the rolling upgrade procedure can be started.
Closes #36984