Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[DOCS] restructure java clients docs pages #25517

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 4, 2017

Conversation

javanna
Copy link
Member

@javanna javanna commented Jul 3, 2017

This commit converts the low level client and high level client chapters into two parts, which allows each high level client supported api to be on a separate page and show up in the index on the right.

This commit converts the low level client and high level client chapters into two parts, which allows each high level client supported api to be on a separate page and show up in the index on the right.
Copy link
Member

@nik9000 nik9000 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Makes sense to me. If it looks good on render I'm happy with it. @clintongormley may also want to look.

@javanna javanna merged commit 3c5eb6c into elastic:master Jul 4, 2017
javanna added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 4, 2017
This commit converts the low level client and high level client chapters into two parts, which allows each high level client supported api to be on a separate page and show up in the index on the right.
jasontedor added a commit to jasontedor/elasticsearch that referenced this pull request Jul 4, 2017
* master:
  [Analysis] Support normalizer in request param (elastic#24767)
  Remove deprecated IdsQueryBuilder constructor (elastic#25529)
  Adds check for negative search request size (elastic#25397)
  test: also inspect the upgrade api response to check whether the upgrade really ran
  [DOCS] restructure java clients docs pages (elastic#25517)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants