Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Cherry-pick #24107 to 7.x: Add unit tests for harvester.go of input-logfile package #24605

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 18, 2021

Conversation

kvch
Copy link
Contributor

@kvch kvch commented Mar 17, 2021

Cherry-pick of PR #24107 to 7.x branch. Original message:

What does this PR do?

This PR adds unit tests for readerGroup and defaultHarvesterGroup of the filestream input.

It also creates a separate error for if a Harvester is already running for a source.

Why is it important?

Test coverage for harvester.go is increased from 0% to 98.4%.

Overall coverage of github.com/elastic/beats/v7/filebeat/input/filestream/internal/input-logfile is increased from 47.4% to 64.8%.

Checklist

  • My code follows the style guidelines of this project
  • I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
    - [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
    - [ ] I have made corresponding change to the default configuration files
  • I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
    - [ ] I have added an entry in CHANGELOG.next.asciidoc or CHANGELOG-developer.next.asciidoc.

## What does this PR do?

This PR adds unit tests for `readerGroup` and `defaultHarvesterGroup` of the `filestream` input.

It also creates a separate error for if a Harvester is already running for a source.

## Why is it important?

Test coverage for `harvester.go` is increased from 0% to 98.4%.

Overall coverage of `github.com/elastic/beats/v7/filebeat/input/filestream/internal/input-logfile`  is increased from 47.4% to 64.8%.

(cherry picked from commit 93fdd0a)
@botelastic botelastic bot added the needs_team Indicates that the issue/PR needs a Team:* label label Mar 17, 2021
@elasticmachine
Copy link
Collaborator

Pinging @elastic/agent (Team:Agent)

@botelastic botelastic bot removed the needs_team Indicates that the issue/PR needs a Team:* label label Mar 17, 2021
Copy link
Contributor

@michalpristas michalpristas left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm

@kvch
Copy link
Contributor Author

kvch commented Mar 18, 2021

jenkins run tests

@elasticmachine
Copy link
Collaborator

💚 Build Succeeded

the below badges are clickable and redirect to their specific view in the CI or DOCS
Pipeline View Test View Changes Artifacts preview

Expand to view the summary

Build stats

  • Build Cause: kvch commented: jenkins run tests

  • Start Time: 2021-03-18T11:06:19.284+0000

  • Duration: 68 min 36 sec

  • Commit: c32adbf

Test stats 🧪

Test Results
Failed 0
Passed 46291
Skipped 5147
Total 51438

Trends 🧪

Image of Build Times

Image of Tests

💚 Flaky test report

Tests succeeded.

Expand to view the summary

Test stats 🧪

Test Results
Failed 0
Passed 46291
Skipped 5147
Total 51438

@kvch kvch merged commit a5e41a6 into elastic:7.x Mar 18, 2021
@zube zube bot removed the [zube]: Done label Jun 17, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
backport Team:Elastic-Agent Label for the Agent team
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants