-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 56
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat: use detect-port v2 #116
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes involve modifications to the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 1
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
package.json
(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
package.json (2)
37-37
: Verify dependency compatibility
The project requires Node.js >= 14.0.0. Let's ensure detect-port v2 maintains this compatibility.
37-37
: Consider updating documentation
Since this is a major version upgrade, consider updating the documentation if there are any changes in usage patterns.
Let's check if documentation updates are needed:
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
lib/master.js (1)
219-224
: Consider adding port conflict handlingWhile the port detection logic works correctly, consider adding retry logic or a port range configuration to handle scenarios where the initially detected port becomes unavailable before the server starts listening.
Example approach:
- Accept a port range configuration option
- Implement retry logic with exponential backoff
- Add proper logging for port conflicts
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
.gitignore
(1 hunks)README.md
(1 hunks)lib/master.js
(2 hunks)package.json
(2 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (2)
- README.md
- .gitignore
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- package.json
🔇 Additional comments (2)
lib/master.js (2)
10-10
: LGTM: Import statement correctly updated for detect-port v2
The change from default import to named import { detectPort }
aligns with detect-port v2's API.
219-224
: LGTM: Port detection logic updated correctly
The port detection implementation has been properly updated to use detect-port v2's API while maintaining the same functionality.
Let's verify the compatibility of detect-port v2:
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more information about the error handling patterns and the detect-port package usage.
Port detection changes are safe and compatible
The verification confirms that:
- detect-port v2.0.1 is used, which maintains backward compatibility
- Error handling is properly implemented with
.catch()
that logs errors and exits - The promise chain correctly handles both cluster and sticky worker port detection
- The API usage matches detect-port's documented interface
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify detect-port v2 compatibility and usage in the codebase
# Check detect-port's exported API
rg -A 5 "require\(['\"']detect-port['\"]"
# Check for any potential error handling patterns that might need updates
rg -B 2 -A 2 "detectPort\(\)"
Length of output: 813
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the package.json for detect-port version and any related dependencies
cat package.json | jq '.dependencies["detect-port"], .devDependencies["detect-port"]'
# Look for error handling patterns around detectPort
rg -B 5 -A 10 "detectPort\(\)" lib/master.js
# Check if there are any tests related to port detection
fd "test|spec" -e js -x rg -l "detectPort"
Length of output: 704
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #116 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 92.52% 92.52%
=======================================
Files 15 15
Lines 2021 2021
Branches 336 336
=======================================
Hits 1870 1870
Misses 151 151 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
[skip ci] ## [2.4.0](v2.3.0...v2.4.0) (2024-12-09) ### Features * use detect-port v2 ([#116](#116)) ([8480a40](8480a40))
Summary by CodeRabbit
detect-port
package in dependencies to the latest major version.git-contributor
package from devDependencies.contributor
script from the project.package-lock.json
and.package-lock.json
to.gitignore
.