-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 56
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat: improve bpn validation #687
feat: improve bpn validation #687
Conversation
dcaef70
to
ba838df
Compare
86bd0ab
to
2392231
Compare
2392231
to
4fbc215
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
maybe bpn-validation
could be good for naming?
👍 for |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks great so far. Two things:
- We should have a DR for this
- The left operand should have a prefix/namespace as explained in the one comment
...clipse/tractusx/edc/validation/businesspartner/store/sql/BusinessPartnerGroupStatements.java
Show resolved
Hide resolved
.../org/eclipse/tractusx/edc/validation/businesspartner/BusinessPartnerEvaluationExtension.java
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
ed74b1c
to
6d8a223
Compare
DR incoming. |
64c9671
to
bcfd0b7
Compare
Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed! 0 Bugs No Coverage information |
WHAT
Improves the BPN validation in the following aspects:
WHY
The old BPN validation extension was inflexible and not scalable and there were technical errors in it.
FURTHER NOTES
business-partner-validation2
- suggestions welcomeCloses #673