feat: add issue template request promotion

[LuisRickert]

---

name: Add request KIT Promotion Issue Template
title: feat add issue templates to request promotion

Description

With this PR we introduce the issue templates to request a promotion for an existing KIT. Raising such an issue will trigger the review process.

[FaGru3n]

Hi @LuisRickert,

cool for checking our the GitHub forms as issue template.

some small things i found.

[FaGru3n]

Hi @LuisRickert i think just a single blank line will be ok

[FaGru3n]

I would leave this out if it is not clear who will be responsible @octocat seems for me to generic

[FaGru3n]

i think just a single blank line will be ok 😉

[FaGru3n]

After some further disscussion and changes to this repo could you add a README seciont after the #10 is merged to describe how to handle this promotion requests?

[carslen]

This is not art but Standard ;)

[FaGru3n]

Hi @LuisRickert because this sig-release repo is getting more in usage of planning and overviewing the release path and processes do you think a new repo would be nice, like "sig-kit" in my opinion it makes it easier to keep on track with the release process and planning things ... and also for the requests against it...?

beside the fact more and more KIT´s will be developed... i would prefer a special repo for a special interest group 😉

[LuisRickert]

Hi @LuisRickert because this sig-release repo is getting more in usage of planning and overviewing the release path and processes do you think a new repo would be nice, like "sig-kit" in my opinion it makes it easier to keep on track with the release process and planning things ... and also for the requests against it...?

beside the fact more and more KIT´s will be developed... i would prefer a special repo for a special interest group 😉

Well, i guess a dedicated Repository is the right way then.

edit: typo

[RolaH1t]

@FaGru3n after several discussions (e.g. with @danielmiehle) I can confirm, that we will "park" the idea of an additional/separate RePo for KITs for the moment. Please work with @kelaja to process all release-relevant issues for KITs also within the SIG Release RePo. We will review the idea towards the and of PI10, once initial learnings can be applied.

[RolaH1t]

@LuisRickert please dismiss this PullRequest. @danielmiehle will also confirm here, that the initial idea of a template to promote a KIT shall not be used for the time being. Thx, Roland

[FaGru3n]

I will close the PR according to the message from @RolaH1t