-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 7
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
OSS Compliance tooling #115
OSS Compliance tooling #115
Conversation
Signed-off-by: GitHub <noreply@github.com>
Signed-off-by: GitHub <noreply@github.com>
Signed-off-by: GitHub <noreply@github.com>
Signed-off-by: GitHub <noreply@github.com>
Signed-off-by: GitHub <noreply@github.com>
Signed-off-by: GitHub <noreply@github.com>
…efinedVehicle/leda-distro-fork into oss-compliance-tooling
Signed-off-by: GitHub <noreply@github.com>
Signed-off-by: GitHub <noreply@github.com>
Signed-off-by: GitHub <noreply@github.com>
Signed-off-by: GitHub <noreply@github.com>
Signed-off-by: GitHub <noreply@github.com>
Signed-off-by: GitHub <noreply@github.com>
Signed-off-by: GitHub <noreply@github.com>
Signed-off-by: GitHub <noreply@github.com>
The work in this PR has reached a point where the principal setup works, basic readme have been added. But the full workflow is not yet implemented, as this depends on the build infrastructure being moved to Eclipse Foundation (or larger GitHub Runners), which is an open help desk issue on EF side. I'd like to merge this content (there is no conflict with existing conflict), as to not lose the work. |
@@ -14,9 +14,6 @@ | |||
# about the context of this file. | |||
header: | |||
version: 12 | |||
includes: | |||
- kas/mirrors.yaml |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We will not use it like that?
@@ -14,9 +14,6 @@ | |||
# about the context of this file. | |||
header: | |||
version: 12 | |||
includes: | |||
- kas/mirrors.yaml | |||
- kas/spdx.yaml |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This one was moved to kas/oss-compliance and we will not use it?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
Integration / template configuration for: