-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 356
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Hostname verifier for the Jetty connector #5278
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I am confused with this.
If enableSslHostnameVerification == true, then the config contains the property JettyClientProperties.ENABLE_SSL_HOSTNAME_VERIFICATION = Boolean.FALSE
It looks to me it should be in vice-versa, is this intentional?.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Or the other way around. Does the user need to set
property(JettyClientProperties.ENABLE_SSL_HOSTNAME_VERIFICATION, Boolean.FALSE)
when the custom hostnameverifier is registered? Maybe it can be set to false automatically, can it not?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
the given test is built in a way for default hostname verification to be failed.
given trust and key stores are for the example.com hostname instead of the localhost. This is done because most of the connectors work in a way that when default hostname verification is failed, the validation is passed to custom hostname verification if any. However Jetty connector works in the opposite way - when default hostname verification is failed, the flow is finished with an exception without passing validation to a custom hostname verifier. That is why default hostname validation should be disabled and only then custom hostname verifier can be tested.
Regarding the other way around - probably not, because hostnames are not necessarily different - those could be localhost/localhost and all would be fine, the custom hostname verifier would be involved in this case. This particular test actually demonstrates only a corner case for generally invalid hostname vs certificate. But in most cases, default hostname validation would pass.