Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Deadline QoS [4993] #446

Merged
merged 55 commits into from
Apr 15, 2019
Merged

Deadline QoS [4993] #446

merged 55 commits into from
Apr 15, 2019

Conversation

raquelalvarezbanos
Copy link
Contributor

@raquelalvarezbanos raquelalvarezbanos commented Mar 11, 2019

This PR adds the Deadline QoS.

Please have a look at the design document in GitLab, which includes the two main approaches discussed. This PR adds the first implementation considered but I also have some commits which I haven't pushed that implement the second approach.

@richiware
Copy link
Member

Build status:

  • Linux Build Status
  • Mac Build Status
  • Windows Build Status

@raquelalvarezbanos raquelalvarezbanos changed the title Deadline QoS Deadline QoS [4693] Mar 11, 2019
@richiware
Copy link
Member

Build status:

  • Linux Build Status
  • Mac Build Status
  • Windows Build Status

@raquelalvarezbanos raquelalvarezbanos changed the title Deadline QoS [4693] Deadline QoS [4993] Mar 25, 2019
@richiware
Copy link
Member

Build status:

  • Linux Build Status
  • Mac Build Status
  • Windows Build Status

@richiware
Copy link
Member

Build status:

  • Linux Build Status
  • Mac Build Status
  • Windows Build Status

@richiware
Copy link
Member

Build status:

  • Linux Build Status
  • Mac Build Status
  • Windows Build Status

@richiware
Copy link
Member

Build status:

  • Linux Build Status
  • Mac Build Status
  • Windows Build Status

@richiware
Copy link
Member

Build status:

  • Linux Build Status
  • Mac Build Status
  • Windows Build Status

@MiguelCompany MiguelCompany mentioned this pull request Mar 29, 2019
31 tasks
richiware
richiware previously approved these changes Mar 29, 2019
@richiware
Copy link
Member

Build status:

  • Linux Build Status
  • Mac Build Status
  • Windows Build Status

Copy link
Member

@richiware richiware left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This QoS was not included in the XML reader.

@richiware
Copy link
Member

Build status:

  • Linux Build Status
  • Mac Build Status
  • Windows Build Status

richiware
richiware previously approved these changes Apr 11, 2019
@richiware
Copy link
Member

Build status:

  • Linux Build Status
  • Mac Build Status
  • Windows Build Status

@richiware
Copy link
Member

Build status:

  • Linux Build Status
  • Mac Build Status
  • Windows Build Status

@richiware
Copy link
Member

Build status:

  • Linux Build Status
  • Mac Build Status
  • Windows Build Status

…d + removing unnecessary cancel of timer
@richiware
Copy link
Member

Build status:

  • Linux Build Status
  • Mac Build Status
  • Windows Build Status

@richiware
Copy link
Member

Build status:

  • Linux Build Status
  • Mac Build Status
  • Windows Build Status

@richiware
Copy link
Member

Build status:

  • Linux Build Status
  • Mac Build Status
  • Windows Build Status

@richiware
Copy link
Member

Build status:

  • Linux Build Status
  • Mac Build Status
  • Windows Build Status

LuisGP
LuisGP previously approved these changes Apr 15, 2019
@richiware
Copy link
Member

Build status:

  • Linux Build Status
  • Mac Build Status
  • Windows Build Status

Copy link
Contributor

@LuisGP LuisGP left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Found issue [5140] while fixing LivelinessAssertion test.

@richiware
Copy link
Member

Build status:

  • Linux Build Status
  • Mac Build Status
  • Windows Build Status

@raquelalvarezbanos raquelalvarezbanos merged commit b833d4e into develop Apr 15, 2019
@raquelalvarezbanos raquelalvarezbanos deleted the feature/DeadlineQos branch April 15, 2019 14:57
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants