Skip to content

Commit

Permalink
Revert "mm/writeback: fix possible divide-by-zero in wb_dirty_limits(…
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history
…), again"

Patch series "mm: Avoid possible overflows in dirty throttling".

Dirty throttling logic assumes dirty limits in page units fit into
32-bits.  This patch series makes sure this is true (see patch 2/2 for
more details).


This patch (of 2):

This reverts commit 9319b64.

The commit is broken in several ways.  Firstly, the removed (u64) cast
from the multiplication will introduce a multiplication overflow on 32-bit
archs if wb_thresh * bg_thresh >= 1<<32 (which is actually common - the
default settings with 4GB of RAM will trigger this).  Secondly, the
div64_u64() is unnecessarily expensive on 32-bit archs.  We have
div64_ul() in case we want to be safe & cheap.  Thirdly, if dirty
thresholds are larger than 1<<32 pages, then dirty balancing is going to
blow up in many other spectacular ways anyway so trying to fix one
possible overflow is just moot.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240621144017.30993-1-jack@suse.cz
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240621144246.11148-1-jack@suse.cz
Fixes: 9319b64 ("mm/writeback: fix possible divide-by-zero in wb_dirty_limits(), again")
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Reviewed-By: Zach O'Keefe <zokeefe@google.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
  • Loading branch information
jankara authored and akpm00 committed Jul 3, 2024
1 parent cf3f9a5 commit 30139c7
Showing 1 changed file with 1 addition and 1 deletion.
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion mm/page-writeback.c
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -1660,7 +1660,7 @@ static inline void wb_dirty_limits(struct dirty_throttle_control *dtc)
*/
dtc->wb_thresh = __wb_calc_thresh(dtc, dtc->thresh);
dtc->wb_bg_thresh = dtc->thresh ?
div64_u64(dtc->wb_thresh * dtc->bg_thresh, dtc->thresh) : 0;
div_u64((u64)dtc->wb_thresh * dtc->bg_thresh, dtc->thresh) : 0;

/*
* In order to avoid the stacked BDI deadlock we need
Expand Down

0 comments on commit 30139c7

Please sign in to comment.