-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Iterative generic math changes to match API review #69391
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
11 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
eab08e6
Change GetShortestBitLength to return int and add WriteBigEndian APIs
tannergooding 0118da2
Add WriteExponentBigEndian and WriteSignificandBigEndian APIs
tannergooding 154c181
Update System.Char to explicitly implement the numeric interfaces
tannergooding 89f2784
Ensure BigInteger.TryWriteBigEndian correctly offsets the address
tannergooding ccb84f1
Fixing two usages of `var` in decimal
tannergooding d4f17c1
Ensure lo64 is ulong and hi32 is uint
tannergooding 5d8473c
Merge remote-tracking branch 'dotnet/main' into generic-math-2
tannergooding 5baf74d
Ensure Int128/UInt128 implement TryWriteBigEndian and return `int` fo…
tannergooding 8eb47d4
Ensure that `GetByteCount` and `GetShortestBitLength` correctly handl…
tannergooding 2d54b7d
Ensure the ReverseEndianness calls in TryWrite* for Int128/UInt128 ar…
tannergooding c55e8e6
Ensure BigInteger.TryWriteLittleEndian has a correct assert
tannergooding File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Does this result in better codegen than just
destination[0] = m_value;
? I'd have expected the guard above (which could also beif (!destination.IsEmpty)
) to remove the bounds check.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Probably not, but its simpler to implement and compare the code when they are all roughly the same size/shape so I've mostly just been doing
write once
,copy/paste
,small tweak
.I can update if you'd prefer it do the simpler thing here.