-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[release/9.0-staging] Remove unneeded DiagnosticSource content #112708
[release/9.0-staging] Remove unneeded DiagnosticSource content #112708
Conversation
The IL link file was getting included as unnecessary content in transitive dependent projects which caused confusion. Fixes #112110
Tagging subscribers to this area: @tarekgh, @tommcdon, @pjanotti |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
@tarekgh - the issue notes say that testing confirmed this worked. I didn't test it before making the .NET 10 fix so just want to make sure there was no confusion there. If you tested it then all is well :)
Yes, I confirmed the .NET 10 package does not contain the file |
Backport of #112116 to release/9.0-staging
/cc @tarekgh @noahfalk
Customer Impact
Users who create a NetFX project and reference the
System.Diagnostics.DiagnosticSource
9.0 package will encounter a build issue similar to the following:The issue arises because the library package includes
ILLink.Descriptors.LibraryBuild.xml
, which is unintentionally marked to be copied during the build, even though it is not necessary. This can also cause confusion for other .NET users, as the fileILLink.Descriptors.LibraryBuild.xml
is automatically created for C# projects that do not use an SDK-style format, impacting many older codebases. More details can be found in the related issue: #112110Regression
This was unintentional change done as part of the PR #106014
Testing
This has been tested with .NET 10 branch and confirmed fixing the reported issue.
Risk
Very low as we are not changing any code more than updating the csproj to not copy the file
ILLink.Descriptors.LibraryBuild.xml
during the build.[High/Medium/Low. Justify the indication by mentioning how risks were measured and addressed.]
IMPORTANT: If this backport is for a servicing release, please verify that:
release/X.0-staging
, notrelease/X.0
.Package authoring no longer needed in .NET 9
IMPORTANT: Starting with .NET 9, you no longer need to edit a NuGet package's csproj to enable building and bump the version.
Keep in mind that we still need package authoring in .NET 8 and older versions.