Fix building x86 Windows native AOT runtime packs #100512
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Looks like we had a whole extra job definition just to avoid building the native AOT parts in the official build.
|
Tagging subscribers to this area: @dotnet/area-infrastructure-libraries |
This was referenced Apr 2, 2024
jkoritzinsky
approved these changes
Apr 3, 2024
MichalStrehovsky
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 4, 2024
#100512 caused an official build break by exposing a latent issue in how we build the managed artifacts. Official builds split managed and native builds for some reason. This is throwing off the heuristic that decides whether to use native AOT's corelib in build. We were always using the native AOT's corelib in x64 and arm64 legs because of the thrown off heuristic. This apparently didn't cause an immediate problem there. It causes a problem on x86 because crossgen2 is a trimmed+r2r+singlefile executable on x86 (and nowhere else) and ILLink execution doesn't like the layouts with `UseNativeAotCoreLib`. Tweak the heuristic to not use native AOT corelib if we're building JIT corelib.
MichalStrehovsky
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 4, 2024
#100512 caused an official build break by exposing a latent issue in how we build the managed artifacts. Official builds split managed and native builds for some reason. This is throwing off the heuristic that decides whether to use native AOT's corelib in build. We were always using the native AOT's corelib in x64 and arm64 legs because of the thrown off heuristic. This apparently didn't cause an immediate problem there. It causes a problem on x86 because crossgen2 is a trimmed+r2r+singlefile executable on x86 (and nowhere else) and ILLink execution doesn't like the layouts with `UseNativeAotCoreLib`. Tweak the heuristic to not use native AOT corelib if we're building JIT corelib.
matouskozak
pushed a commit
to matouskozak/runtime
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 30, 2024
Looks like we had a whole extra job definition just to avoid building the native AOT parts in the official build.
matouskozak
pushed a commit
to matouskozak/runtime
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 30, 2024
dotnet#100512 caused an official build break by exposing a latent issue in how we build the managed artifacts. Official builds split managed and native builds for some reason. This is throwing off the heuristic that decides whether to use native AOT's corelib in build. We were always using the native AOT's corelib in x64 and arm64 legs because of the thrown off heuristic. This apparently didn't cause an immediate problem there. It causes a problem on x86 because crossgen2 is a trimmed+r2r+singlefile executable on x86 (and nowhere else) and ILLink execution doesn't like the layouts with `UseNativeAotCoreLib`. Tweak the heuristic to not use native AOT corelib if we're building JIT corelib.
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Looks like we had a whole extra job definition just to avoid building the native AOT parts in the official build, so the x86 packages we produce are incomplete.
I'm in no rush getting this in, obviously the 1ES switchover is higher pri.
Cc @dotnet/ilc-contrib