Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update ValueGenerated using conventions. #7302

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 14, 2017
Merged

Update ValueGenerated using conventions. #7302

merged 1 commit into from
Apr 14, 2017

Conversation

AndriySvyryd
Copy link
Member

Fixes #7205

@ajcvickers
Copy link
Contributor

@divega Per triage discussion and the comments in #7205, can you look at this an make a judgement as to whether the "complexity increase" is worth it? My opinion is that it is not, especially given that the existing way of doing it will likely get even simpler when we implement Nine Rings for Nine Kings (#7166).

@divega divega self-assigned this Jan 6, 2017
@divega divega added this to the 2.0.0 milestone Jan 6, 2017
@divega divega removed their assignment Apr 10, 2017
@divega
Copy link
Contributor

divega commented Apr 10, 2017

Discussed this and @AndriySvyryd will send a new version.

@AndriySvyryd
Copy link
Member Author

@ajcvickers Rebased

Copy link
Contributor

@ajcvickers ajcvickers left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

:shipit:

@AndriySvyryd AndriySvyryd merged commit c9c9600 into dev Apr 14, 2017
@AndriySvyryd AndriySvyryd deleted the Issue7205 branch April 14, 2017 19:16
@ajcvickers ajcvickers removed this from the 2.0.0-preview1 milestone Oct 15, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants