This repository has been archived by the owner on Jan 23, 2023. It is now read-only.
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.7k
Fix SIMD intrinsics handling in crossgen2 #27853
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -697,6 +697,15 @@ private uint getMethodAttribsInternal(MethodDesc method) | |
result |= CorInfoFlag.CORINFO_FLG_FINAL; | ||
} | ||
|
||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
|
||
#if READYTORUN | ||
// Check for SIMD intrinsics | ||
DefType owningDefType = method.OwningType as DefType; | ||
if (owningDefType != null && VectorFieldLayoutAlgorithm.IsVectorOfTType(owningDefType)) | ||
{ | ||
throw new RequiresRuntimeJitException("This function is using SIMD intrinsics, their size is machine specific"); | ||
} | ||
#endif | ||
|
||
// Check for hardware intrinsics | ||
if (HardwareIntrinsicHelpers.IsHardwareIntrinsic(method)) | ||
{ | ||
|
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
For #23899, I had added this as
InteropTypes.IsSystemNumericsVectorT
, as that appears to be where a fair number of the otherIsType
checks liveThere was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I am not sure which location is better. Your methods are also a bit different as they require the TypeSystemContext parameter. So maybe keeping both versions makes sense. There was already the IsVectorType here, so adding the IsVectorOfTypeT to the same place felt ok.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
InteropTypes
only handles types interesting for interop (as the name implies). Up until Tanner's change it was exclusively used in generating/figuring out marshalling. Crossgen2 doesn't have a centralMscorlibBinder
equivalent (as it exists in CoreCLR).We place these as close to the usage as possible. Centralized locations tend to end up with orphaned entries.