Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Revisit Relations Properties Contract #457

Closed
dmfs opened this issue Oct 17, 2017 · 1 comment
Closed

Revisit Relations Properties Contract #457

dmfs opened this issue Oct 17, 2017 · 1 comment
Labels

Comments

@dmfs
Copy link
Owner

dmfs commented Oct 17, 2017

The relations properties need to be revisited before put in production. Some values might be obsolete.

@dmfs
Copy link
Owner Author

dmfs commented Oct 17, 2017

Also consider adding a column to identify reverse relations or automatically created relations. The idea is to automatically create a child->parent relationship for every parent->child relationship (and vice versa). Though there should be something which that identifies these automatic relations so a sync-adapter can filter them out.

@dmfs dmfs added the contract label Oct 18, 2017
dmfs added a commit that referenced this issue Nov 30, 2017
* remove all the `public static final` modifiers
* remove RELATED_URL
* remove some currently unsupported RelTypes
* convert RelTypes from enum to ints to allow unsupported reltypes.
dmfs added a commit that referenced this issue Dec 1, 2017
* remove all the `public static final` modifiers
* remove RELATED_URL
* remove some currently unsupported RelTypes
* convert RelTypes from enum to ints to allow unsupported reltypes.
dmfs added a commit that referenced this issue Dec 4, 2017
* remove all the `public static final` modifiers
* remove RELATED_URL
* remove some currently unsupported RelTypes
* convert RelTypes from enum to ints to allow unsupported reltypes.
@dmfs dmfs closed this as completed Dec 7, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant