reformat docs for diffraction objects #251
Closed
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Warning! No news item is found for this PR. If this is a user-facing change/feature/fix, |
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #251 +/- ##
=========================================
Coverage 100.00% 100.00%
=========================================
Files 8 8
Lines 380 380
=========================================
Hits 380 380 |
|
@yucongalicechen I saw that. I merged because it is easier to edit docs not on branches. I did the fix and some rewriting. We probably want to close this PR. Please make sure that there is not anything you want from here then we can close. |
|
closed as replaced by #254 |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
@sbillinge this PR is a reformat of #249. When I just rendered the doc I saw some codes were not shown / formatted poorly because I had some codes wrong. Now it's corrected. ready for merge.