Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add Helm over Operator job to full E2E #3

Draft
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: devel
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

dfarrell07
Copy link
Owner

As we move to better support Helm over Operator deployments, we need to
start adding tests to other repos. For now only add a basic,
default-only canary job.

Signed-off-by: Daniel Farrell dfarrell@redhat.com

@dfarrell07
Copy link
Owner Author

There seems to be some sort of bug that breaks default k8s_version values when one isn't provided here:

2021-06-02T15:36:41.1765851Z /opt/shipyard/scripts/clusters.sh: line 27: kind_k8s_versions: bad array subscript
2021-06-02T15:36:41.1768333Z Running with: k8s_version=, olm_version=0.14.1, olm=false, globalnet=false, registry_inmemory=true, cluster_settings=/go/src/github.com/submariner-io/submariner-operator/scripts/kind-e2e/cluster_settings, timeout=5m

Which breaks the install:

2021-06-02T15:38:55.4520743Z �[36m[submariner-operator]$ [cluster1] command kubectl --context=cluster1 apply -f https://cloud.weave.works/k8s/net?k8s-version=v&env.IPALLOC_RANGE=10.1.0.0/16�[0m
2021-06-02T15:38:55.4523241Z [cluster1] error: unable to read URL "https://cloud.weave.works/k8s/net?k8s-version=v&env.IPALLOC_RANGE=10.1.0.0/16", server reported 400 Bad Request, status code=400

@dfarrell07 dfarrell07 force-pushed the add_canary_helm_job branch 10 times, most recently from d2cbe79 to eeff185 Compare June 9, 2021 14:45
As we move to better support Helm over Operator deployments, we need to
start adding tests to other repos. For now only add a basic,
default-only canary job.

Signed-off-by: Daniel Farrell <dfarrell@redhat.com>
@dfarrell07 dfarrell07 force-pushed the add_canary_helm_job branch from eeff185 to c77160c Compare June 9, 2021 15:31
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant