You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
As of 4fc81d4, the cpu-mask
property in the "openamp,domain-v1" binding says:
- *cpu-mask* is a bitfield indicating the subset of CPUs in the cluster which
the domain runs on
I'd like to propose that we extend this binding to say that a value of
0 means that the domain runs on all of the CPUs in the cluster.
This seems like a common case and it is a useful shorthand which may
help users, especially since we could define a self-documenting macro
like DOMAIN_CPU_MASK_ALL for this.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Extend the execution domain binding to say that a cpu-mask cell value
of 0 means that the domain runs on all of the CPUs in the cluster.
This seems like a common case, and it is a useful shorthand which may
help users, who could define a self-documenting macro like
"DOMAIN_CPU_MASK_ALL" or so for this.
Fixes: devicetree-org#166
Signed-off-by: Martí Bolívar <marti.bolivar@nordicsemi.no>
Reviewed-by: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@amd.com>
As of 4fc81d4, the
cpu-mask
property in the "openamp,domain-v1" binding says:
I'd like to propose that we extend this binding to say that a value of
0 means that the domain runs on all of the CPUs in the cluster.
This seems like a common case and it is a useful shorthand which may
help users, especially since we could define a self-documenting macro
like
DOMAIN_CPU_MASK_ALL
for this.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: