-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 22
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Update to LRG target selection code #179
Conversation
Resulting LRG selection has about 590 targets per sq. deg. when run on DR3.1 |
Can you point me to the output files of running this new selection on DR3.1? I need to make sure the current set of LRG templates span the color-space of this new sample. |
Sure...I'll send you that link over email. |
With apologies for the delay, I'm looking at this now. @geordie666 could you fix the conflict(s) in the Also note that we (someone not me!) will need to update the nominal redshift distribution in |
@geordie666 I resolved the conflict in I don't think that any shortcomings in the LRG templates (and there are some..) should hold up this PR, but these comparisons are good to see and will help inform the next set of template updates. I'll also share the notebook on-list for input and comments. |
@geordie666 Can you or Kyle update the n(z) for this selection? Are we ready to merge this? I'm working on updated templates but what I'm using are good enough for now. |
If all you need is an update to the N(z) in desimodel in SVN, then I can do
this as soon as we merge (or at least, within a day)...
Ad.
…On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 2:10 PM, Moustakas ***@***.***> wrote:
@geordie666 <https://github.com/geordie666> Can you or Kyle update the
n(z) for this selection?
#179 (comment)
<#179 (comment)>
Are we ready to merge this? I'm working on updated templates but what I'm
using are good enough for now.
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#179 (comment)>,
or mute the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ANTmRWTvs8v7nltapDIaE54yKG1cOx9Wks5sGDVhgaJpZM4NlWGH>
.
|
…into LRGupdatesADM
Moving the most recent Eisenstein/Dawson LRG code over from the sandbox so it's our default until the TS WG indicates otherwise.