Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Added sorbet typecheck under python module on 5 files #11261
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Added sorbet typecheck under python module on 5 files #11261
Changes from 23 commits
b62d316
4047bcb
0c7d855
0682f60
c6b8aca
a0527c8
35e77ed
036aa7f
c8aa9af
e1b473c
a7fae08
b32c50c
9586bea
611444e
291f9ab
34a78c7
955f98a
a58b3e5
8442af3
e6d6fac
e5261c5
d9dfa0f
f44145f
7dea911
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Suggested Change: Instead of using
T::Hash[T.untyped, T.untyped]
, useT::Hash[Symbol, String]
(or another more specific type) to improve type safety and clarity.Reasoning:
T.untyped
allows any type, which weakens Sorbet’s ability to provide meaningful type checks.Symbol
as the key type andString
as the value type (or another suitable type if necessary), you:There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
why is this a nilable boolean?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, I also think all conditions are handled. It shouldn't be nillable.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yeah, I corrected it now, thanks to both of you.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
What is this
T.untyped
? Is it something changing dependency to the situation?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think
T.untyped
is not proper unless necessaryThere was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Same here,
T.untyped
?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think we do have return type here but not sure.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
are requirements actually untyped?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
can you update the typed: strict here too?