Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[fix] autostig period for idx 0 behaved incorrectly #2680

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 29, 2024

Conversation

tepals
Copy link
Contributor

@tepals tepals commented Feb 21, 2024

For idx 0 even if the autostig period was set to 0 it would still run the extended pre-calibrations. Additionally it should not run for idx 0, only for subsequent indices.

@tepals tepals requested a review from nandishjpatel February 21, 2024 12:28
@tepals tepals force-pushed the fix-fastem-autostig-period-idx0 branch 2 times, most recently from dd53b67 to c711963 Compare February 27, 2024 15:15
@tepals tepals requested a review from pieleric February 27, 2024 15:16
For idx 0 even if the autostig period was set to 0 it would still run the extended pre-calibrations. Additionally it should not run for idx 0, only for subsequent indices.
Re-initialize AcquisitionConfig() instead of using conf.get_acqui_conf() for autostigmation and for the overlap, so the GUI does not have to be restarted when changing the value. This increases flexibility during testing.
@tepals tepals force-pushed the fix-fastem-autostig-period-idx0 branch from c711963 to b71d792 Compare February 27, 2024 15:18
@pieleric pieleric merged commit 8b02f6a into delmic:master Feb 29, 2024
5 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants