[TIDY FIRST] Click option defintiion organization (alphabetization)

[QMalcolm]

Resolves #N/A because it's a tidy first

Problem

The organization of click option definitions in cli/params.py was a weird mixture of some alphabetization, new options getting added to the EOF, and grouping by feature. This mean the only way to find an option was to do a text search which was annoying. It also made it confusing as to where a new option should get added. Alphabetically? To the end of the file? Was there some similar option that the new option should be "near"?

Solution

Alphabetize the click option definitions.

Checklist

• I have read the contributing guide and understand what's expected of me.
• I have run this code in development, and it appears to resolve the stated issue.
• This PR includes tests, or tests are not required or relevant for this PR.
• This PR has no interface changes (e.g., macros, CLI, logs, JSON artifacts, config files, adapter interface, etc.) or this PR has already received feedback and approval from Product or DX.
• This PR includes type annotations for new and modified functions.

[QMalcolm]

A quick way to "validate" all the options are still there is to do a text search on the old and new file for click.option(. They should have the same number of hits.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 88.92%. Comparing base (31881d2) to head (b38d55a).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main   #11236      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   88.93%   88.92%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         187      187              
  Lines       24049    24049              
==========================================
- Hits        21388    21386       -2     
- Misses       2661     2663       +2     

Flag	Coverage Δ
integration	86.31% <100.00%> (-0.01%)	⬇️
unit	62.47% <100.00%> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Components	Coverage Δ
Unit Tests	62.47% <100.00%> (ø)
Integration Tests	86.31% <100.00%> (-0.01%)	⬇️