Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[GSoC2024] - fix/attribute-text-length-limited-for-adding-values #7761
[GSoC2024] - fix/attribute-text-length-limited-for-adding-values #7761
Changes from all commits
5cbdd72
19af95f
73b5ead
3011102
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Probably, it is not a good solution to increase the limit here and use
CharField
. Since we're using PostgreSQL, there shouldn't be any problems with wasting memory when thevalues
field is small, but... Perhaps it will be better to useTextField
here and add a limit in the code (but not to thevalues
field since we store a list with attribute values in a string with a custom separator) - introduce an upper limit on the max number of characters for an attribute value and max number of attributes. + This looks logical to me also because we have a limit forAttributeVal.value
.