Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update Finnish VAT to 10% #231

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

Update Finnish VAT to 10% #231

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

ljungqvist
Copy link
Contributor

The Finnish VAT will be 10% starting 2022-12-01. The VAT will go back to it's normal 24% again 2023-05-01.

@jeveli
Copy link

jeveli commented Nov 30, 2022

I have tested this about a month ago and can confirm it's working and is the easy to edit.

@ljungqvist
Copy link
Contributor Author

One downside is that the default name sensor id changes. E.g. sensor.nordpool_kwh_fi_eur_4_095_024 -> sensor.nordpool_kwh_fi_eur_4_095_01

@Hellowlol
Copy link
Collaborator

Hi

Thanks for the PR. Temporary vat changes will not be merged. Please use additional costs template to do you on vat calculations. See the readme for an example.

@Kirbo
Copy link

Kirbo commented Jan 3, 2023

Hi

Thanks for the PR. Temporary vat changes will not be merged. Please use additional costs template to do you on vat calculations. See the readme for an example.

Sorry for resurrecting old closed issue, but could you then at least remove the "Enable VAT" checkbox once and for all or at least add some tooltip/description/something next to it, that which percentage it uses.
I was happily using the integration and thought that the VAT is somehow being calculated correctly, but it clearly is not.
Now, as a workaround, I re-created the integration, disabled VAT and calculate the price via the Additional Cost input.

But anywho, for me, it makes no sense whatsoever to have both "Enable VAT" and "Additional Cost" input. It merely confuses the users.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants