You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hi,
Currently RushTI has a binary behavior when it comes to return codes. If all processes finish successfully then it returns 0, if any process fails (for whatever reason) it return a non-zero value.
It would be great to introduce a flag per task that allows processes that end with HasMinorErrors to be considered successful (i.e.: to give a returnCode of 0).
Though it's a TI responsibility to handle possible minor errors, there could be times where this is not either possible or even followed.
This parameter must OPTIONAL and, IMHO, should only be applicable to OptimizedTasks as they are the ones that you would use when you want to have more precise control on the outcome of the TI processes invoked by RushTI.
It would look like this: id="1" predecessors="" require_predecessor_success="" succeed_on_minor_errors="1" instance="tm1srv01" process="export.actuals" pMonth=Jan
Thoughts?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi,
Currently RushTI has a binary behavior when it comes to return codes. If all processes finish successfully then it returns 0, if any process fails (for whatever reason) it return a non-zero value.
It would be great to introduce a flag per task that allows processes that end with
HasMinorErrors
to be considered successful (i.e.: to give a returnCode of 0).Though it's a TI responsibility to handle possible minor errors, there could be times where this is not either possible or even followed.
This parameter must OPTIONAL and, IMHO, should only be applicable to OptimizedTasks as they are the ones that you would use when you want to have more precise control on the outcome of the TI processes invoked by RushTI.
It would look like this:
id="1" predecessors="" require_predecessor_success="" succeed_on_minor_errors="1" instance="tm1srv01" process="export.actuals" pMonth=Jan
Thoughts?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: