Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix narrowing in equality of mixed types #810

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jan 21, 2025
Merged

Fix narrowing in equality of mixed types #810

merged 2 commits into from
Jan 21, 2025

Conversation

mborland
Copy link
Member

Closes: #799

Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 21, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 98.9%. Comparing base (069c26a) to head (1116018).
Report is 13 commits behind head on develop.

Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##           develop    #810     +/-   ##
=========================================
+ Coverage     98.9%   98.9%   +0.1%     
=========================================
  Files          227     228      +1     
  Lines        16967   16978     +11     
  Branches      1809    1809             
=========================================
+ Hits         16775   16786     +11     
  Misses         192     192             
Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
include/boost/decimal/detail/comparison.hpp 99.4% <ø> (ø)
test/github_issue_799.cpp 100.0% <100.0%> (ø)

Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 069c26a...1116018. Read the comment docs.

@mborland mborland merged commit 30ed86c into develop Jan 21, 2025
75 checks passed
@mborland mborland deleted the 799 branch January 21, 2025 19:08
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Incorrect == with __uint128t/uint64_t
1 participant