docs: update docs for v5.1.1 release #2100
Conversation
WalkthroughWalkthroughThe update to version 5.1.1 emphasizes critical improvements, particularly in rectifying message definitions within the provider module's protocol files. This release is marked as both API and state breaking, prompting users to verify their implementations for compatibility. Additionally, the changelog and release notes have been enhanced to provide clearer, more concise insights into the changes and their potential impacts on users. Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant User
participant Application
participant Provider Module
participant Protocol Files
User->>Application: Request to interact with Provider Module
Application->>Provider Module: Call with old message definition
Provider Module->>Protocol Files: Validate message
alt Validation fails
Provider Module-->>Application: Return error
else Validation succeeds
Provider Module->>Application: Process request
Application-->>User: Return response
end
Recent review detailsConfiguration used: .coderabbit.yml Files selected for processing (2)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
Additional context usedPath-based instructions (1)
Markdownlint
Additional comments not posted (4)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Outside diff range, codebase verification and nitpick comments (1)
RELEASE_NOTES.md (1)
1-4: Correct the comparison link in the release notes.The changelog link is correct, but the comparison link is invalid (404 error). Please update the comparison link to accurately compare v5.1.0 to v5.1.1.
- Current link: v5.1.0...v5.1.1
- Suggested correction: Verify the correct URL format for comparing versions on GitHub and update accordingly.
Analysis chain
Verify the changelog link.
Ensure that the changelog link points to the correct version (v5.1.0) and the comparison link accurately compares v5.1.0 to v5.1.1.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the correctness of the changelog and comparison links. # Test: Check if the changelog link is correct. Expect: Link to v5.1.0 changelog. curl -s -o /dev/null -w "%{http_code}" https://github.com/cosmos/interchain-security/blob/v5.1.0/CHANGELOG.md # Test: Check if the comparison link is correct. Expect: Link comparing v5.1.0 to v5.1.1. curl -s -o /dev/null -w "%{http_code}" https://github.com/cosmos/interchain-security/compare/v5.1.0...v5.1.1Length of output: 229
Tools
Markdownlint
3-3: Expected: 1; Actual: 0; Below
Headings should be surrounded by blank lines(MD022, blanks-around-headings)
|
Should this also be adjusted to say v5.1.1? |
Co-authored-by: Philip Offtermatt <57488781+p-offtermatt@users.noreply.github.com>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Outside diff range, codebase verification and nitpick comments (1)
RELEASE_NOTES.md (1)
3-3: Add a blank line before the heading.Headings should be surrounded by blank lines to improve readability.
- ## 📝 ChangelogTools
Markdownlint
3-3: Expected: 1; Actual: 0; Below
Headings should be surrounded by blank lines(MD022, blanks-around-headings)
|
|
||
| Upgrade code will be executed automatically during the upgrade procedure. | ||
|
|
||
| ### Consumer | ||
|
|
||
| Upgrading the consumer from `v5.0.0` to `v5.1.0` will not require state migration. | ||
| Upgrading the consumer from `v5.0.0` to `v5.1.1` will not require state migration. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Remove trailing space.
There is a trailing space at the end of the line. Remove it to adhere to markdownlint rules.
- Upgrading the consumer from `v5.0.0` to `v5.1.1` will not require state migration.
+ Upgrading the consumer from `v5.0.0` to `v5.1.1` will not require state migration.Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| Upgrading the consumer from `v5.0.0` to `v5.1.1` will not require state migration. | |
| Upgrading the consumer from `v5.0.0` to `v5.1.1` will not require state migration. |
Tools
Markdownlint
17-17: Expected: 0 or 2; Actual: 1
Trailing spaces(MD009, no-trailing-spaces)
Description
Update changelog and release docs for
ICS v5.1.1.Closes: #XXXX
Author Checklist
All items are required. Please add a note to the item if the item is not applicable and
please add links to any relevant follow up issues.
I have...
docs:prefix in the PR titleReviewers Checklist
All items are required. Please add a note if the item is not applicable and please add
your handle next to the items reviewed if you only reviewed selected items.
I have...
docs:prefix in the PR titlemake build-docs)Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Documentation