-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 138
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat!: Rewire dependencies on the staking module #2056
feat!: Rewire dependencies on the staking module #2056
Conversation
a0cedbe
to
6e79bfc
Compare
WalkthroughWalkthroughThe update restructures the initialization of keepers in the application, focusing on Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)N/A Assessment against linked issues
Recent review detailsConfiguration used: .coderabbit.yml Files selected for processing (2)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
// tokens of the first MaxProviderConsensusValidators validators. | ||
// This is used to implement the interface of the staking keeper to interface with | ||
// modules that need to reference the consensus-active validators. | ||
func (k Keeper) TotalBondedTokens(ctx context.Context) (math.Int, error) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looking at TotalBondedTokens
it's not fully clear to me that bonded tokens does not include the tokens of non-consensus-active validators.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I changed the docstring, does that help?
Or are you talking about the code?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Here are some references for how the original TotalBondedTokens function behaves:
It just gets the tokens in the bonded pool here https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/blob/a32186608aab0bd436049377ddb34f90006fcbf7/x/staking/keeper/pool.go#L80
the bonded pool contains the tokens from bonded validators. e.g. see here that tokens are sent to the bonded pool when someone delegates to an active validator https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/blob/a32186608aab0bd436049377ddb34f90006fcbf7/x/staking/keeper/delegation.go#L913,
and how tokens are transferred between bonded/not-bonded pool on valstatechanges https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/blob/a32186608aab0bd436049377ddb34f90006fcbf7/x/staking/keeper/val_state_change.go#L251
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Outside diff range, codebase verification and nitpick comments (1)
docs/docs/adrs/adr-017-allowing-inactive-validators.md (1)
78-115
: Testing Scenarios section looks good with a minor grammatical correction.The testing scenarios are detailed and cover all necessary aspects.
However, consider the following grammatical correction:
- Afterwards, we create another proposal and vote on it with active validators, too. + Afterward, we create another proposal and vote on it with active validators, too.Tools
LanguageTool
[locale-violation] ~92-~92: In American English, ‘afterward’ is the preferred variant. ‘Afterwards’ is more commonly used in British English and other dialects.
Context: ...lidators. The proposal should not pass. Afterwards, we create another proposal and vote on...(AFTERWARDS_US)
Markdownlint
81-81: Expected: asterisk; Actual: dash
Unordered list style(MD004, ul-style)
82-82: Expected: asterisk; Actual: dash
Unordered list style(MD004, ul-style)
83-83: Expected: asterisk; Actual: dash
Unordered list style(MD004, ul-style)
80-80: Expected: 0 or 2; Actual: 1
Trailing spaces(MD009, no-trailing-spaces)
81-81: Expected: 0 or 2; Actual: 1
Trailing spaces(MD009, no-trailing-spaces)
81-81: null
Lists should be surrounded by blank lines(MD032, blanks-around-lists)
* Change wiring for mint and gov to use ProviderKeeper instead of StakingKeeper * Add test for IterateBondedValidatorsByPower * Rewire GovKeeper * Fix docstrings * Test other modified functions * Start writing some testing scenarios * Add TotalBondedTokens to expected staking keeper interface
…er chains (#2079) * refactor!: Refactor the validator set storage and add provider consensus validator storage (#1990) * Refactor validator set storage * Add comment for getTotalPower * Add provider consensus validator set storage * Add key to key test * Add unit test for LastTotalProviderConsensusPower * Address comments * feat!: Introduce the MaxProviderConsensusValidators param (#1992) * Refactor validator set storage * Add comment for getTotalPower * Add provider consensus validator set storage * Add new MaxProviderConsensusValidators param * Add validation for MaxProviderConsensusValidators * Add function to get MaxProviderConsensusValidators param * refactor!: Refactor the validator set storage and add provider consensus validator storage (#1990) * Refactor validator set storage * Add comment for getTotalPower * Add provider consensus validator set storage * Add key to key test * Add unit test for LastTotalProviderConsensusPower * Address comments * feat!: Wire the provider module to return ValidatorUpdates, instead of the staking module (#1993) * Refactor validator set storage * Add comment for getTotalPower * Add provider consensus validator set storage * Add new MaxProviderConsensusValidators param * Add validation for MaxProviderConsensusValidators * Add no_valupdates_staking module * Add function to get MaxProviderConsensusValidators param * Start returning validators in EndBlock * Fix tests * Revert cosmetic change * Revert cosmetic changes * Revert formatting * Add genutil replacer module * Revert formatting * Revert formatting in tests/integration * Revert minor formatting * Fix type * Change wrapped staking to conform to EndBlocker interface * Fix typo * Revert "Fix typo" This reverts commit 62dfd1e. * Add e2e test for inactive vals * Start fixing e2e test * Revert formatting changes * Remove more formatting * Revert extra formatting * Re-wire provider/app.go to use wrapped modules * Remove consumer rewards check * Add inactive provider vals testcase to nightly * Adjust comment * Address comments * Fix nightly test name * feat: Initialize the max validators parameter for existing consumers (#2012) * Add initialization for validator cap * Remove migration test * Fix inconsistent naming * test: enable the simulator for the provider module (#2005) * Refactor validator set storage * Add comment for getTotalPower * Add provider consensus validator set storage * Add new MaxProviderConsensusValidators param * Add validation for MaxProviderConsensusValidators * Add no_valupdates_staking module * Add function to get MaxProviderConsensusValidators param * Start returning validators in EndBlock * Fix tests * Revert cosmetic change * Revert cosmetic changes * Revert formatting * Add genutil replacer module * Revert formatting * Revert formatting in tests/integration * Revert minor formatting * Fix type * Change wrapped staking to conform to EndBlocker interface * Fix typo * Revert "Fix typo" This reverts commit 62dfd1e. * Add e2e test for inactive vals * Start fixing e2e test * Revert formatting changes * Remove more formatting * Revert extra formatting * Re-wire provider/app.go to use wrapped modules * Remove consumer rewards check * Add simulator test * Add randomly generated parameters for provider in sim * Add invariant * Add simulation to Makefile and github workflow * Use simcli instead of just passing true * feat!: Let consumer chains choose a minimum stake and validator rank (#2035) * Add minimum stake key * Add MinValidatorRank prefix * Add keeper and tests for new parameters * Utilize MinStake and MaxRank parameters in computing next validators * Mention MinStake and MaxRank in adr * Add test for FulfillsMinStake * Handle multiple validators with same power * Add min stake and max rank to docs * Add minStake and maxRank to proposals * Check for untyped equality * Handle minStake and maxRank in Msgs * Add integration test for min stake and max rank * Rename test and testfile * Update docs/docs/adrs/adr-017-allowing-inactive-validators.md * Add changelog entries for maxrank and minstake * Address comments * Clarify which feature is disabled by setting maxrank * Test validator powers cap and validator set cap into int param testing function * feat!: Rewire dependencies on the staking module (#2056) * Change wiring for mint and gov to use ProviderKeeper instead of StakingKeeper * Add test for IterateBondedValidatorsByPower * Rewire GovKeeper * Fix docstrings * Test other modified functions * Start writing some testing scenarios * Add TotalBondedTokens to expected staking keeper interface * feat: Calculate Top N based on active validators only (#2070) * Add test for inactive vals with top N * Add test case to predefined tests * Fix bonded/active validator distinction * Fix relay test to set max provider consensus vals correctly * feat!: Add a parameter that determines whether consumer chains allow inactive validators to validate them (#2066) * Introduce new AllowInactiveValidators param for consumer chains * Add AllowInactiveValidators param to tests * Set MaxProviderConsensusValidators in tests * Add migration to initialize inactive vals * Add changelog entries for inactive vals param * Add property-based test for inactive vals * Add docs for inactive vals param * Set AllowInactiveVals parameter in e2e test * test: Add e2e tests for inactive vals (#2064) * Start adding e2e test for governance * Debug gov with inactive vals test * Outline for test scenarios where they are tested * Add MaxRank steps * Add e2e tests for min stake and max rank * Revert formatting change * Refactor stepsOptIn * Use adjusted config for e2e tests * Write for more scenarios where they are tested * Add test for mint * Add docstrings for e2e steps * Delete hanging changelog entry * Address comments * Address more comments * Add migration for param * Fix allow inactive validators param test * Fix tests * Add LastProviderConsensusValidatorKey to fully defined keys * Fix key for validator set updates * Add info about genesis/endblock ordering * Add unit test for ProviderValidatorUpdates * Add example to proto definition of max_rank * Remove max rank * Remove references to max rank * Start adding an extension to the simulator * Make invariant fail early when param is 0 * Reorder InitGenesis to put Crisis last * Remove canary * Swap equals for not equals * Disable invariant check when max validators != max provider consensus validators * Make the simulator use a random seed * Remove TODO * Remove decoder * Run go mod tidy * Add migration in UPGRADING.md * Fix tests * Put random seed generation into golang code * Rename simulation jobs * Update UPGRADING.md Co-authored-by: Marius Poke <marius.poke@posteo.de> * Update UPGRADING.md Co-authored-by: Marius Poke <marius.poke@posteo.de> * Update x/ccv/provider/keeper/genesis.go Co-authored-by: Marius Poke <marius.poke@posteo.de> * Mention simulation tests in testing.md * Address some comments * Remake protos * Panic when LastActiveBondedValidators fails * Address some comments * Address comments * Reorder tests * Adjust stake_multiplier to stakeMultiplier * Address comments * Add error logging * Fix reference to bank blocked addrs in simulation * Change hasToValidate to only take into account active validators * Update docs/docs/adrs/adr-017-allowing-inactive-validators.md Co-authored-by: insumity <karolos@informal.systems> * Clarify: Slash happens on provider Co-authored-by: insumity <karolos@informal.systems> --------- Co-authored-by: Marius Poke <marius.poke@posteo.de> Co-authored-by: insumity <karolos@informal.systems>
Description
Closes: #1913
See https://informalsystems.notion.site/Staking-dependencies-in-Cosmos-SDK-v0-50-5-and-ibc-go-v8-3-2-669889523e1840f68996f69946bf388e?pvs=25 for some context
This wires some modules (mint, governance) to use the provider keeper as a replacement of the staking keeper.
This is because these modules need to be wired to take into account the consensus validators, instead of the whole bonded validator set.
This PR:
Author Checklist
All items are required. Please add a note to the item if the item is not applicable and
please add links to any relevant follow up issues.
I have...
!
to the type prefix if the change is state-machine breakingCHANGELOG.md
Reviewers Checklist
All items are required. Please add a note if the item is not applicable and please add
your handle next to the items reviewed if you only reviewed selected items.
I have...
!
the type prefix if the change is state-machine breakingSummary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Refactor
MintKeeper
,GovKeeper
,ProviderKeeper
) for improved dependency management and setup sequence.Tests
IterateBondedValidatorsByPower
,TotalBondedTokens
, andBondedRatio
.StakingKeeper
to include additional methods and context handling.Documentation