-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 657
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
docs: payee registration and fee distribution for relayer operators #1577
Changes from all commits
aa6af5d
2999f54
474a4e6
13908cb
de000c6
7d9b443
49251ce
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,90 @@ | ||
<!-- | ||
order: 4 | ||
--> | ||
|
||
# Fee distribution | ||
|
||
Learn about payee registration for the distribution of packet fees. The following document is intended for relayer operators. {synopsis} | ||
|
||
## Pre-requisite readings | ||
|
||
* [Fee Middleware](overview.md) {prereq} | ||
|
||
Packet fees are divided into 3 distinct amounts in order to compensate relayer operators for packet relaying on fee enabled IBC channels. | ||
|
||
- `RecvFee`: The sum of all packet receive fees distributed to a payee for successful execution of `MsgRecvPacket`. | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Seeing as we're saying the There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Maybe that could be added to the section Escrowing and paying out fees of @charleenfei's PR. There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Yeah, possibly adding to @charleenfei's PR would be a nice idea and segway into linking to this docs page. There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Yea, though the fact that the fees are stored as separate structs is an implementation detail imo. I think it makes sense to say that And in the |
||
- `AckFee`: The sum of all packet acknowledgement fees distributed to a payee for successful execution of `MsgAcknowledgement`. | ||
- `TimeoutFee`: The sum of all packet timeout fees distributed to a payee for successful execution of `MsgTimeout`. | ||
|
||
## Register a payee address for forward relaying | ||
|
||
As mentioned in [ICS29 Concepts](../ics29-fee/overview.md#concepts), the forward relayer describes the actor who performs the submission of `MsgRecvPacket` on the destination chain. | ||
Fee distribution for incentivized packet relays takes place on the packet source chain. | ||
Relayer operators are expected to register a counterparty payee address, in order to be compensated accordingly with `RecvFee`s upon completion of a packet lifecycle. | ||
The counterparty payee address registered on the destination chain is encoded into the packet acknowledgement and communicated as such to the source chain for fee distribution. | ||
If a counterparty payee is not registered for the forward relayer on the destination chain, the escrowed fees will be refunded upon fee distribution. | ||
|
||
A transaction must be submitted to the desintation chain including a `CounterpartyPayee` address of an account on the source chain. | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. destination |
||
The transaction must be signed by the `Relayer`. | ||
|
||
```go | ||
type MsgRegisterCounterpartyPayee struct { | ||
// unique port identifier | ||
PortId string | ||
// unique channel identifier | ||
ChannelId string | ||
// the relayer address | ||
Relayer string | ||
// the counterparty payee address | ||
CounterpartyPayee string | ||
} | ||
``` | ||
|
||
This message is expected to fail if: | ||
|
||
- `PortId` is invalid (see [24-host naming requirements](https://github.com/cosmos/ibc/blob/master/spec/core/ics-024-host-requirements/README.md#paths-identifiers-separators). | ||
- `ChannelId` is invalid (see [24-host naming requirements](https://github.com/cosmos/ibc/blob/master/spec/core/ics-024-host-requirements/README.md#paths-identifiers-separators)). | ||
- `Relayer` is an invalid address (see [Cosmos SDK Addresses](https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/blob/main/docs/basics/accounts.md#Addresses)). | ||
- `CounterpartyPayee` is empty. | ||
|
||
See below for an example CLI command: | ||
|
||
``` | ||
simd tx ibc-fee register-counterparty-payee transfer channel-0 cosmos1rsp837a4kvtgp2m4uqzdge0zzu6efqgucm0qdh osmo1v5y0tz01llxzf4c2afml8s3awue0ymju22wxx2 --from cosmos1rsp837a4kvtgp2m4uqzdge0zzu6efqgucm0qdh | ||
``` | ||
|
||
## Register a payee address for reverse and timeout relaying | ||
|
||
As mentioned in [ICS29 Concepts](../ics29-fee/overview.md#concepts), the reverse relayer describes the actor who performs the submission of `MsgAcknowledgement` on the source chain. | ||
Similarly the timeout relayer describes the actor who performs the submission of `MsgTimeout` (or `MsgTimeoutOnClose`) on the source chain. | ||
Relayer operators may choose to register an optional payee address, in order to be compensated accordingly with `AckFee`s and `TimeoutFee`s upon completion of a packet life cycle. | ||
If a payee is not registered for the reverse or timeout relayer on the source chain, then fee distribution assumes the default behaviour, where fees are paid out to the relayer account which delivers `MsgAcknowledgement` or `MsgTimeout`/`MsgTimeoutOnClose`. | ||
|
||
A transaction must be submitted to the source chain including a `Payee` address of an account on the source chain. | ||
The transaction must be signed by the `Relayer`. | ||
|
||
```go | ||
type MsgRegisterPayee struct { | ||
// unique port identifier | ||
PortId string | ||
// unique channel identifier | ||
ChannelId string | ||
// the relayer address | ||
Relayer string | ||
// the payee address | ||
Payee string | ||
} | ||
``` | ||
|
||
This message is expected to fail if: | ||
|
||
- `PortId` is invalid (see [24-host naming requirements](https://github.com/cosmos/ibc/blob/master/spec/core/ics-024-host-requirements/README.md#paths-identifiers-separators). | ||
- `ChannelId` is invalid (see [24-host naming requirements](https://github.com/cosmos/ibc/blob/master/spec/core/ics-024-host-requirements/README.md#paths-identifiers-separators)). | ||
- `Relayer` is an invalid address (see [Cosmos SDK Addresses](https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/blob/main/docs/basics/accounts.md#Addresses)). | ||
- `Payee` is an invalid address (see [Cosmos SDK Addresses](https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/blob/main/docs/basics/accounts.md#Addresses)). | ||
|
||
See below for an example CLI command: | ||
|
||
``` | ||
simd tx ibc-fee register-payee transfer channel-0 cosmos1rsp837a4kvtgp2m4uqzdge0zzu6efqgucm0qdh cosmos153lf4zntqt33a4v0sm5cytrxyqn78q7kz8j8x5 --from cosmos1rsp837a4kvtgp2m4uqzdge0zzu6efqgucm0qdh | ||
``` |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Nice. This is a meta-level comment but perhaps we can have who the document is intended for as its own seperate section at the top?