-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
chore: use TxBody instead of the deprecated TxBodyCompat #23350
Conversation
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThe pull request modifies the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Finishing Touches
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
x/auth/tx/builder.go (2)
120-123
: Simplify the conditional check fortimeoutTimestamp
The condition
(w.timeoutTimestamp.IsZero() || w.timeoutTimestamp.Unix() == 0)
is redundant becausew.timeoutTimestamp.IsZero()
is sufficient to check for a zerotime.Time
value. Simplifying the condition improves code readability.Update the condition to:
if !w.unordered && w.timeoutTimestamp.IsZero() {
Line range hint
120-131
: Reduce code duplication when constructingTxBody
Both branches of the conditional assign to
body
with mostly identical fields. To enhance maintainability and readability, consider constructingTxBody
once and then setting the conditional fields separately.Refactor the code as follows:
body := &txv1beta1.TxBody{ Messages: anyMsgs, Memo: w.memo, TimeoutHeight: w.timeoutHeight, ExtensionOptions: intoAnyV2(w.extensionOptions), NonCriticalExtensionOptions: intoAnyV2(w.nonCriticalExtensionOptions), } if !w.timeoutTimestamp.IsZero() && w.timeoutTimestamp.Unix() != 0 { body.TimeoutTimestamp = timestamppb.New(w.timeoutTimestamp) } if w.unordered { body.Unordered = w.unordered }
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
x/auth/tx/builder.go
(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
x/auth/tx/builder.go (1)
Pattern **/*.go
: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (3)
- GitHub Check: test-system-v2
- GitHub Check: Analyze
- GitHub Check: Summary
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This has been introduced on purpose in #22723 to keep txs created in v0.52 work with previous versions.
Description
Closes: #XXXX
Author Checklist
All items are required. Please add a note to the item if the item is not applicable and
please add links to any relevant follow up issues.
I have...
!
in the type prefix if API or client breaking changeCHANGELOG.md
Reviewers Checklist
All items are required. Please add a note if the item is not applicable and please add
your handle next to the items reviewed if you only reviewed selected items.
Please see Pull Request Reviewer section in the contributing guide for more information on how to review a pull request.
I have...
Summary by CodeRabbit
TxBody
structureThe changes optimize the transaction processing mechanism with more standardized and robust implementation.