Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

perf: store/cachekv: avoid a map lookup if unnecessary, clear maps fast, avoid keys sort (backport #10486) #10848

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jan 3, 2022
Merged
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
4 changes: 4 additions & 0 deletions CHANGELOG.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -46,6 +46,10 @@ Ref: https://keepachangelog.com/en/1.0.0/

### Improvements

* [\#10486](https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/pull/10486) store/cachekv's `Store.Write` conservatively
looks up keys, but also uses the [map clearing idiom](https://bencher.orijtech.com/perfclinic/mapclearing/)
to reduce the RAM usage, CPU time usage, and garbage collection pressure from clearing maps,
instead of allocating new maps.
* (store) [\#10741](https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/pull/10741) Significantly speedup iterator creation after delete heavy workloads. Significantly improves IBC migration times.

### Bug Fixes
Expand Down
34 changes: 23 additions & 11 deletions store/cachekv/store.go
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -118,22 +118,34 @@ func (store *Store) Write() {
// TODO: Consider allowing usage of Batch, which would allow the write to
// at least happen atomically.
for _, key := range keys {
cacheValue := store.cache[key]

switch {
case store.isDeleted(key):
if store.isDeleted(key) {
// We use []byte(key) instead of conv.UnsafeStrToBytes because we cannot
// be sure if the underlying store might do a save with the byteslice or
// not. Once we get confirmation that .Delete is guaranteed not to
// save the byteslice, then we can assume only a read-only copy is sufficient.
store.parent.Delete([]byte(key))
case cacheValue.value == nil:
// Skip, it already doesn't exist in parent.
default:
continue
}

cacheValue := store.cache[key]
if cacheValue.value != nil {
// It already exists in the parent, hence delete it.
store.parent.Set([]byte(key), cacheValue.value)
}
}

// Clear the cache
store.cache = make(map[string]*cValue)
store.deleted = make(map[string]struct{})
store.unsortedCache = make(map[string]struct{})
// Clear the cache using the map clearing idiom
// and not allocating fresh objects.
// Please see https://bencher.orijtech.com/perfclinic/mapclearing/
for key := range store.cache {
delete(store.cache, key)
}
for key := range store.deleted {
delete(store.deleted, key)
}
for key := range store.unsortedCache {
delete(store.unsortedCache, key)
}
store.sortedCache = dbm.NewMemDB()
}

Expand Down