-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Tune PebbleDB Options #18178
Labels
Comments
alexanderbez
added
C:Store
WG: Storage
and removed
needs-triage
Issue that needs to be triaged
labels
Oct 19, 2023
cc @Kbhat1 |
Are you able to post the benchmarks here? |
#17504 :) |
Are the results posted anywhere? |
They're in the PR @tac0turtle: https://pastebin.com/raw/q5LhTcRy |
my bad was viewing on mobile |
@Kbhat1 from Sei is helping us benchmark further and find a possible set of ideal opts. |
20 tasks
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
We currently use default opts for PebbleDB as a SS backend in store v2.
Benchmarks show that reads are very fast but writes are pretty awful in terms of performance.
Even though SS should be read optimized, writes should not be a huge bottleneck. There are a handful of levers we should explore tuning, e.g.
MemTableSize
, to ensure writes are as efficient as possible.For reference, these are the PebbleDB levers CockroachDB tunes: https://github.com/cockroachdb/cockroach/blob/master/pkg/storage/pebble.go#L602
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: