Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update CI VM images #23157

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 3, 2024
Merged

Conversation

cevich
Copy link
Member

@cevich cevich commented Jul 1, 2024

Specifically, the included Debian image should not fail all networking tests.

Ref: containers/automation_images#363

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?

None

Specifically, the included Debian image should not fail all networking
tests.

Signed-off-by: Chris Evich <cevich@redhat.com>
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. release-note-none labels Jul 1, 2024
@edsantiago
Copy link
Member

LGTM. machine-mac test has been flaking all day in all PRs I'm watching. No amount of reruns seems to help.

@cevich cevich marked this pull request as ready for review July 1, 2024 19:51
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Jul 1, 2024
@cevich
Copy link
Member Author

cevich commented Jul 1, 2024

Thanks @edsantiago I guess I'll check back in tomorrow/later in the week.

@cevich
Copy link
Member Author

cevich commented Jul 1, 2024

Ugh, the dreaded

  /Users/MacM1-3-worker/ci/task-4802452959002624/bin/darwin/podman machine rm --force 4844e8092aa3
  Error: 4844e8092aa3: VM does not exist

I remember running into this/similar problem very early on with MacOS CI. It hurts my brain why the podman-machine code can't just completely ignore this. Removal of the VM was the goal!

@edsantiago
Copy link
Member

That's a red herring. Real bug is #22551

@rhatdan
Copy link
Member

rhatdan commented Jul 2, 2024

/approve
/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jul 2, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jul 2, 2024

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: cevich, rhatdan

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Jul 2, 2024
@openshift-merge-bot openshift-merge-bot bot merged commit b5bfd72 into containers:main Jul 3, 2024
89 of 90 checks passed
@stale-locking-app stale-locking-app bot added the locked - please file new issue/PR Assist humans wanting to comment on an old issue or PR with locked comments. label Oct 2, 2024
@stale-locking-app stale-locking-app bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Oct 2, 2024
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. locked - please file new issue/PR Assist humans wanting to comment on an old issue or PR with locked comments. release-note-none
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants