complete containers#556 to-do list

[unknowndevQwQ]

Some details: #556 (comment)

Signed-off-by: unknowndev233@github unknowndevQwQ@protonmail.com

[unknowndevQwQ]

/assign @rhatdan

[rhatdan]

LGTM
@saschagrunert @vrothberg @giuseppe @containers/podman-maintainers PTAL

[rhatdan]

/approve

[openshift-ci]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: rhatdan, unknowndev233

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• OWNERS [rhatdan]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[vrothberg]

I think we're back to the reminder that the contributing guidelines require the author to reveal their name. I think that's the third time I remind of that. Did something change or is there an exception I am not aware of?

[unknowndevQwQ]

I think we're back to the reminder that the contributing guidelines require the author to reveal their name. I think that's the third time I remind of that. Did something change or is there an exception I am not aware of?

I am forced to remain anonymous because I didn't want to be sent to prison for national security reasons by the government. My first PR may have explained the situation. However, the translation engine may cause deviations in what I want to say

[vrothberg]

I am very sorry to read that, @unknowndev233!

Unfortunately that does not change our contributing guidelines. Please let's resolve this issue before opening more pull requests. Note that we don't do this to reveal private information but for legal reasons; every author has rights.

@rhatdan @TomSweeneyRedHat shall I reach out to legal? Maybe we can get make an exception or maybe there's a special rule that would allow @unknowndev233 to continue contributing.

[TomSweeneyRedHat]

I think the best thing to do is to thoroughly review his PR's like this one, and then if it's satisfactory, have an identified person from the community grab the git diff and create a separate PR. My $.02, but throwing an email past the legal eagles might not be a bad idea @vrothberg

[unknowndevQwQ]

Unfortunately that does not change our contributing guidelines. Please let's resolve this issue before opening more pull requests. Note that we don't do this to reveal private information but for legal reasons; every author has rights.

I know, but I don't want to disclose my real name directly

[rhatdan]

@unknowndev233 We do not want to force you to reveal your name. We are just making sure we handle this as legally as possible.

[unknowndevQwQ]

@unknowndev233 We do not want to force you to reveal your name. We are just making sure we handle this as legally as possible.

I agree with @TomSweeneyRedHat's solution

[rhatdan]

Legal has determined that this content change is not copy-writable, so that we can merge without a real signature.

[rhatdan]

/lgtm

[rhatdan]

Thanks @unknowndev233

[rhatdan]

/hold cancel