Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[libpcap] add option to build with or without dpdk #9264

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

public-src-code
Copy link

Specify library name and version: lib/1.0

This is also a good place to share with all of us why you are submitting this PR (specially if it is a new addition to ConanCenter): is it a dependency of other libraries you want to package? Are you the author of the library? Thanks!


  • I've read the guidelines for contributing.
  • I've followed the PEP8 style guides for Python code in the recipes.
  • I've used the latest Conan client version.
  • I've tried at least one configuration locally with the
    conan-center hook activated.

@CLAassistant
Copy link

CLA assistant check
Thank you for your submission! We really appreciate it. Like many open source projects, we ask that you sign our Contributor License Agreement before we can accept your contribution.
You have signed the CLA already but the status is still pending? Let us recheck it.

@conan-center-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

Sorry, the build is only launched for Access Request users. You can request access writing in this issue.

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Feb 4, 2022

I detected other pull requests that are modifying libpcap/all recipe:

This message is automatically generated by https://github.com/ericLemanissier/conan-center-conflicting-prs so don't hesitate to report issues/improvements there.

@ghost ghost mentioned this pull request Feb 11, 2022
4 tasks
@SSE4 SSE4 changed the title add option to build with or without dpdk [libpcap] add option to build with or without dpdk Mar 11, 2022
@stale
Copy link

stale bot commented Apr 11, 2022

This pull request has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.

@stale stale bot added the stale label Apr 11, 2022
@stale
Copy link

stale bot commented May 26, 2022

This pull request has been automatically closed because it has not had recent activity. Thank you for your contributions.

@stale stale bot closed this May 26, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants