Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Support mill init from an existing SBT project (2000USD Bounty) #3450

Open
lihaoyi opened this issue Sep 3, 2024 · 21 comments
Open

Support mill init from an existing SBT project (2000USD Bounty) #3450

lihaoyi opened this issue Sep 3, 2024 · 21 comments
Labels

Comments

@lihaoyi
Copy link
Member

lihaoyi commented Sep 3, 2024


From the maintainer Li Haoyi: I'm putting a 2000USD bounty on this issue, payable by bank transfer on a merged PR implementing this.


We should be able to run ./mill init to do a best effort conversion of an existing SBT project to Mill:

  • Code-generate a build.mill containing a MavenModulefor the root build.sbt, the package.mill for any subfolder build.sbts or SBT subprojects in the root build.sbt
  • Convert the main and test dependencies on third-party libraries to ivyDeps
  • Convert inter-subproject dependencies to moduleDeps
  • Set any necessary javacOptions
  • Implement PublishModule with relevant metadata

Such a conversion will never be 100%, but if we can automate 80% of the conversion that will already be a huge help for people migrating to Mill or even just trying it out

@lihaoyi lihaoyi changed the title Support mill init from an SBT project (1500USD Bounty) Support mill init from an existing SBT project (1500USD Bounty) Sep 3, 2024
@lefou lefou added the bounty label Sep 3, 2024
@Dylanb-dev
Copy link

hello, I am having a look at this. I haven't used java much (just a bit of clojure and kotlin) so might take a couple days for PR. If I don't have anything in 48 hours happy for anyone else to take this.

@steinybot
Copy link

I'll take a crack at this.

@lihaoyi
Copy link
Member Author

lihaoyi commented Sep 10, 2024

@steinybot go for it

@Dylanb-dev
Copy link

Dylanb-dev commented Sep 16, 2024

Hi, I have been looking at this.

I am using scala-meta to parse the SBT files, can I confirm some test examples?

Test 1 - basic sbt from sbt documentation

  ThisBuild / scalaVersion := "2.13.12"
  ThisBuild / organization := "com.example"

  lazy val hello = project
    .in(file("."))
    .settings(
      name := "Hello",
      libraryDependencies ++= Seq(
        "org.scala-lang" %% "toolkit" % "0.1.7",
        "org.scala-lang" %% "toolkit-test" % "0.1.7" % Test
      )
    )

produces ./build.sc with

import mill._, scalalib._

object Hello extends MavenModule {
  def scalaVersion = "2.13.12"
  def organization = "com.example"

  def ivyDeps = Agg(
    ivy"org.scala-lang::toolkit:0.1.7"
  )

  object test extends ScalaTests with TestModule.Munit {
    def ivyDeps = Agg(
      ivy"org.scala-lang::toolkit-test:0.1.7"
    )
  }
} 

test 2 - more complex realworld sbt with publishing

import Dependencies._

ThisBuild / scalaVersion := "2.12.19"
ThisBuild / version := "0.1.0-SNAPSHOT"
ThisBuild / organization := "com.example"
ThisBuild / organizationName := "example"

lazy val root = (project in file("."))
  .settings(
    name := "Hello",
    libraryDependencies += scalaTest % Test
  )
libraryDependencies += "org.scalameta" %% "scalameta" % "4.9.9"
// libraryDependencies += "com.typesafe.play" %% "play-json" % "2.9.2"

produces this mill build.sc

import mill._, scalalib._, publish._
import Dependencies._

object Hello extends MavenModule with PublishModule {
  def scalaVersion = "2.12.19"
  def publishVersion = "0.1.0-SNAPSHOT"
  
  def ivyDeps = Agg(
    ivy"org.scala-lang::toolkit:0.1.7"
  )

  def pomSettings = PomSettings(
    name = "example",
    organization = "com.example",
  )

  object test extends ScalaTests with TestModule.Munit {
    def ivyDeps = Agg(
      ivy"org.scala-lang::toolkit-test:0.1.7"
    )
  }
}

test 3 - build.sbt with subprojects

ThisBuild / version      := "0.1.0"
ThisBuild / scalaVersion := "2.13.6"
ThisBuild / organization := "com.example"

val scalaTest = "org.scalatest" %% "scalatest" % "3.2.7"
val gigahorse = "com.eed3si9n" %% "gigahorse-okhttp" % "0.5.0"
val playJson  = "com.typesafe.play" %% "play-json" % "2.9.2"

lazy val hello = (project in file("."))
  .aggregate(helloCore)
  .dependsOn(helloCore)
  .enablePlugins(JavaAppPackaging)
  .settings(
    name := "Hello",
    libraryDependencies += scalaTest % Test,
  )

lazy val helloCore = (project in file("core"))
  .settings(
    name := "Hello Core",
    libraryDependencies ++= Seq(gigahorse, playJson),
    libraryDependencies += scalaTest % Test,
  )

Produces the following build.sc

import mill._, scalalib._

object Hello extends MavenModule with PublishModule {
  def scalaVersion = "2.13.6"
  def publishVersion = "0.1.0"
  
  def ivyDeps = Agg(
      ivy"com.eed3si9n::gigahorse-okhttp:0.5.0",
      ivy"com.typesafe.play::play-json:2.9.2",
      ivy"org.scala-lang::toolkit-test:0.1.7"
    )

  def pomSettings = PomSettings(
    name = "Hello",
    organization = "com.example",
  )

  object test extends ScalaTests with TestModule.Munit {
    def ivyDeps = Agg(
      ivy"org.scala-lang::toolkit-test:0.1.7"
    )
  }
}

with the following in ./core/package.mill

package build.core

import mill._, scalalib._

object `package` extends MavenModule with ScalaModule {
  def name = "Hello Core"
  def ivyDeps = Agg(
      ivy"com.eed3si9n::gigahorse-okhttp:0.5.0",
      ivy"com.typesafe.play::play-json:2.9.2",
      ivy"org.scala-lang::toolkit-test:0.1.7"
    )
  object test extends ScalaTests with TestModule.Munit {
      def ivyDeps = Agg(
        ivy"org.scala-lang::toolkit-test:0.1.7"
      )
}

@lihaoyi
Copy link
Member Author

lihaoyi commented Sep 16, 2024

Those examples look reasonable. One issue is that Scala-Meta parsing has a pretty low ceiling of how sophisticated builds it can handle. e.g. once people start having variables or helper methods, which is very common, it no longer works.

I'd say that to do this well, we want to actually run SBT to evaluate the SBT build files, and export the metadata that results from this evaluation. That way you don't care how much indirection exists in the SBT build: SBT has to be able to handle it, and in the end convert it to a "dumb metadata" format that will be much easier for Mill to process

@Dylanb-dev
Copy link

Sounds reasonable, I checked sbt for meta data output and https://github.com/sbt/sbt-buildinfo but it seemed too limited. I will take a closer look.

@lihaoyi
Copy link
Member Author

lihaoyi commented Sep 16, 2024

There's an SBT -> Bazel converter that I think goes through SBT to dump its metadata https://github.com/stripe-archive/sbt-bazel

@lihaoyi
Copy link
Member Author

lihaoyi commented Sep 16, 2024

This may be relevant as well https://stackoverflow.com/a/62767456/871202

@sideeffffect
Copy link
Contributor

@Dylanb-dev https://github.com/oyvindberg/bleep can import sbt builds too. AFAIK it works by exporting sbt build to BSP (the .bsp/ directory) and then importing information to Bleep from it.
Maybe you could use this trick too.

@llvee
Copy link

llvee commented Sep 23, 2024

@Dylanb-dev Did you complete this?

If not please let me know in the next 24 hours as I am interested in potentially attempting this.

@Dylanb-dev
Copy link

Dylanb-dev commented Sep 24, 2024

@llvee

Go ahead, although it might be better to wait for #3449 to be finished which will help make this issue much easier to complete.

@llvee
Copy link

llvee commented Sep 25, 2024

@Dylanb-dev Thank you for mentioning that, I will review #3449.

@lihaoyi
Copy link
Member Author

lihaoyi commented Nov 14, 2024

@ajaychandran's PR #3449 has landed, in case anyone wants to take a crack at this. We should be able to re-use all the rendering logic, and the only issue them becomes how to extract the relevant metadata from an SBT build to feed into the renderer

@lihaoyi lihaoyi changed the title Support mill init from an existing SBT project (1500USD Bounty) Support mill init from an existing SBT project (2000USD Bounty) Nov 25, 2024
@lihaoyi
Copy link
Member Author

lihaoyi commented Nov 25, 2024

Bumping the bounty on this from 1500 -> 2000USD

@Friendseeker
Copy link

I am currently working on this bounty. I have a concrete plan (use sbt-structure to parse the sbt settings & use #3449 to transpile the parsed settings), however I have other commitments in my life so my progress is slow.

I am down teaming up with others. I do not aim to take a monetary cut (I plan to ask Haoyi for information as reward, instead of monetary reward). If you would like to team up with me, feel free to join Mill's discord channel and ping me.

@lihaoyi
Copy link
Member Author

lihaoyi commented Dec 2, 2024

Haha if you want information just email me and ask, no need to wait for completing the ticket. Can answer whatever questions you have today to the best of my abilities

@sake92
Copy link
Contributor

sake92 commented Jan 10, 2025

Had a look at sbt-structure, it works well but it doesn't give us declared dependencies, but all (including transitive ones).
It isn't possible (to my understanding) to figure out which ones are transitive.. :/
Same thing with Bloop export, full classpath only.

Maybe we can steal the code from bloop:
https://github.com/scalacenter/bloop/blob/main/integrations/sbt-bloop/src/main/scala/bloop/integrations/sbt/SbtBloop.scala#L1146
or sbt-structure https://github.com/JetBrains/sbt-structure/tree/master/extractor/src/main/scala/org/jetbrains/sbt/extractors
but it's a looot of code there. 😄

But it's almost certainly easier than parsing sbt's output.
It doesn't print dependencies properly, e.g. you cant disambiguate between a java (%) and scala dep (%%)

@sideeffffect
Copy link
Contributor

doesn't give us declared dependencies, but all (including transitive ones)

Is sbt-structure or Bloop open to adding this feature?

@lihaoyi
Copy link
Member Author

lihaoyi commented Jan 13, 2025

I'd suggest anyone who wants to tackle this should just copy-paste/fork the implementations from sbt-structure or bloop. Long term maintenance of the fork and whether or not we can upstream it can be discussed later, first priority is just to get something working at all

@lihaoyi
Copy link
Member Author

lihaoyi commented Jan 24, 2025

#4363 has landed, so mill init now has support for both Maven and Gradle projects. That PR also substantially refactors the auto-migration code to clean it up which should make it substantially easier to plug in support for SBT: you no longer need to worry about build-file generation at all! Just extract the subproject metadata from an SBT build, put it into the case classes defined in ir.scala, and we're done.

Seems like it should be an easy 2000USD for anyone who wants to pick this up and bring it over the finish line

@ShreckYe
Copy link
Contributor

Hi I see it's been some days since #4363 landed. Is anyone working on this now? I helped review #4363, got free recently, and would like to give this a try, but I don't want to compete if there's someone already working on it.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

9 participants