Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

executor's execute might be DOSed leading to initaitor losing all transaction gas #611

Closed
c4-bot-5 opened this issue Jan 23, 2024 · 3 comments
Labels
2 (Med Risk) Assets not at direct risk, but function/availability of the protocol could be impacted or leak value bug Something isn't working duplicate-70 insufficient quality report This report is not of sufficient quality unsatisfactory does not satisfy C4 submission criteria; not eligible for awards

Comments

@c4-bot-5
Copy link
Contributor

Lines of code

https://github.com/code-423n4/2024-01-decent/blob/011f62059f3a0b1f3577c8ccd1140f0cf3e7bb29/src/UTBExecutor.sol#L70

Vulnerability details

Impact

Medium, tranasaction initiator might lost whole gas while the transaction reverts.

Proof of Concept

executor.execute() is run with extraNative parameter hardocoded to 0, thus the flow of execution is as below:

        uint256 initBalance = IERC20(token).balanceOf(address(this));

        IERC20(token).transferFrom(msg.sender, address(this), amount); 
        IERC20(token).approve(paymentOperator, amount);
        
        (success,) = target.call(payload); // 63/64 of gas is forwarded

        uint256 remainingBalance = IERC20(token).balanceOf(address(this)) - initBalance;

        if (remainingBalance == 0) {
            return;
        }

        IERC20(token).transfer(refund, remainingBalance);

The target.call is perfomed without specifying the gas sent, thus 63/64 of available gas is sent with the call.
In the case of malicous 'target' the whole gas might be spend on this call, while the 1/64 might not be enough to cover the token balanceOF call thus reverting the transaction.
As a result, the transaction initiator lost gas.

Tools Used

VSCode

Recommended Mitigation Steps

Assessed type

Other

@c4-bot-5 c4-bot-5 added 2 (Med Risk) Assets not at direct risk, but function/availability of the protocol could be impacted or leak value bug Something isn't working labels Jan 23, 2024
c4-bot-2 added a commit that referenced this issue Jan 23, 2024
@c4-pre-sort
Copy link

raymondfam marked the issue as duplicate of #70

@c4-pre-sort
Copy link

raymondfam marked the issue as insufficient quality report

@c4-pre-sort c4-pre-sort added the insufficient quality report This report is not of sufficient quality label Jan 25, 2024
@c4-judge
Copy link

c4-judge commented Feb 2, 2024

alex-ppg marked the issue as unsatisfactory:
Insufficient proof

@c4-judge c4-judge added the unsatisfactory does not satisfy C4 submission criteria; not eligible for awards label Feb 2, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
2 (Med Risk) Assets not at direct risk, but function/availability of the protocol could be impacted or leak value bug Something isn't working duplicate-70 insufficient quality report This report is not of sufficient quality unsatisfactory does not satisfy C4 submission criteria; not eligible for awards
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants