QA Report

[c4-bot-9]

See the markdown file with the details of this report here.

[raymondfam]

Generic findings with most of them already known from the bot(s).

[c4-pre-sort]

raymondfam marked the issue as sufficient quality report

[alex-ppg]

QA Judgment

The Warden's QA report has been graded B based on a score of 29 combined with a manual review per the relevant QA guideline document located here.

The Warden's submission's score was assessed based on the following accepted findings:

Low-Risk

• L-01
• L-03

Non-Critical

• L-02
• L-04
• N-05

[c4-judge]

alex-ppg marked the issue as grade-b

[alex-ppg]

To note, this submission was tied with #616 and #542 for an A grade per the relevant guidelines shared above. I opted to retain #616 as the A grade report due to its more "manual" nature in comparison to #542 (this report) and #604 which contain a lot of bot-related findings and follow the format of statically generated findings.