Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Feb 19, 2025. It is now read-only.

Add basic expanded sflow tests #48

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 2, 2020
Merged

Add basic expanded sflow tests #48

merged 1 commit into from
Mar 2, 2020

Conversation

simPod
Copy link
Contributor

@simPod simPod commented Jan 2, 2020

I have been debugging expanded sflow parsing and for that I wrote these 2 tests.

(I was not sure it was being parsed properly. The error in the end was in reading prometheus metrics (wrong label filter) so everything in goflow works as expected)

I though might share rather than removing it, WDYT?

@lspgn
Copy link
Contributor

lspgn commented Jan 6, 2020

LGTM. Thank you for writing the test :) .

@lspgn
Copy link
Contributor

lspgn commented Jan 30, 2020

Sorry I've been taking too long at verifying this PR.

Are you sure you want to share a real sFlow sample? I'm noticing a few ip addresses in there that don't seem to be obfuscated.

@simPod
Copy link
Contributor Author

simPod commented Jan 31, 2020

I merged two flow samples into one so it should not represent real communication. Do you think it is not safe still?

@lspgn
Copy link
Contributor

lspgn commented Jan 31, 2020

I'd be careful in case of an audit: non-obfuscated PII (even if long ago) since it's the full sFlow packet.
Would prefer not have to clear the whole git history if that were to cause an issue.

@lspgn lspgn merged commit ef5ec28 into cloudflare:master Mar 2, 2020
@simPod simPod deleted the expanded-sflow-test branch March 2, 2020 09:27
tgragnato pushed a commit to tgragnato/goflow that referenced this pull request Aug 14, 2024
…control

Add flags to control Kafka Flush parameters
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants