This repository has been archived by the owner on Jun 26, 2020. It is now read-only.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Isn't
this.state.originalWidth
, well, the original width of the image? Or the naming here is ... unfortunate?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Okay, it looks like it is the width at the start of the resize process 🤦♂ . Please confirm that this value is what we wanted.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The problem with
originalWidth
is that it is a calculated original width (as we need real pixels count for some math later on).You could apply it back to the view before committing the results, but that would just cover up the problem - as it would still not necessarily be the original value (e.g. when initially image view has no width, or width in units like em, pt - which gets converted).
The proper solution would be to store view's initial width and reapply it just before calling
onCommit
.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
A quick and dirty PoC pushed to
i/6060a
branch, see if that's what you're looking for.