-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 825
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[NFC] add comments & extract function in contribution search #9716
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
4 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
686df92
CRM-19815 extract soft credit fields for readability
eileenmcnaughton 59f9e5a
CRM-19830 add test to lock in test contract
eileenmcnaughton ef32adf
CRM-19815 tidy test & lock in return of financial_type
eileenmcnaughton 8f165fa
Comment fixes
eileenmcnaughton File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This looks nicer.
A suggestion on docblock style going-forward (not meant as a complaint about this):
@param $apiEntity
looks like a typical case where I'd try to include an example as part of the doc, as in:As readers who are tuned-in to the nuances of Civi's data modelling (SQL/DAO/BAO/API), you and I probably interpret
apiEntity
as "an entity name in the camel-case notation of APIv3" (ContributionPage
), but less experienced contributors might interpret "entity" more ambiguously. (ContributionPage
,contribution_page
,api/v3/ContributionPage.php
,civicrm_api3_contribution_page_*
,CRM_Contribute_DAO_ContributionPage
, andcivicrm_contribution_page
are all ways to identify the same entity... and all those ways would actually show up if you were tracing an API call.)An example value is a really simple/clear.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Agree - although when I add stuff to pre-existing comments I don't feel the need to be that thorough