Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

if no clicks, display 0 rather than empty string #29568

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Mar 2, 2024

Conversation

jmcclelland
Copy link
Contributor

Overview

The display of clicks in the Mailings tab shows an empty string instead of 0.

Before

Confusing - looks like the display of clicks is broken:

empty-clicks

After

Now, clicks display properly as zero:

zero-clicks

Technical Details

I love the NULL coalesce operator! Unfortunately, it only seems to work when assigning variables, not when appending. At least I think that is what is going wrong?

Comments

I also opted to make consistent the collection of both clicks and opens just so it's more readable. I think the coalesce operator is our preferred method rather than using CRM_Utils_Array::value?

Copy link

civibot bot commented Mar 1, 2024

🤖 Thank you for contributing to CiviCRM! ❤️ We will need to test and review this PR. 👷

Introduction for new contributors...
  • If this is your first PR, an admin will greenlight automated testing with the command ok to test or add to whitelist.
  • A series of tests will automatically run. You can see the results at the bottom of this page (if there are any problems, it will include a link to see what went wrong).
  • A demo site will be built where anyone can try out a version of CiviCRM that includes your changes.
  • If this process needs to be repeated, an admin will issue the command test this please to rerun tests and build a new demo site.
  • Before this PR can be merged, it needs to be reviewed. Please keep in mind that reviewers are volunteers, and their response time can vary from a few hours to a few weeks depending on their availability and their knowledge of this particular part of CiviCRM.
  • A great way to speed up this process is to "trade reviews" with someone - find an open PR that you feel able to review, and leave a comment like "I'm reviewing this now, could you please review mine?" (include a link to yours). You don't have to wait for a response to get started (and you don't have to stop at one!) the more you review, the faster this process goes for everyone 😄
  • To ensure that you are credited properly in the final release notes, please add yourself to contributor-key.yml
  • For more information about contributing, see CONTRIBUTING.md.
Quick links for reviewers...

➡️ Online demo of this PR 🔗

@civibot civibot bot added the master label Mar 1, 2024
@demeritcowboy
Copy link
Contributor

It was probably that . is stronger than ?? so it was evaluating wrong, but either way. Since you're editing it, seems like it should have ts()?

@jmcclelland
Copy link
Contributor Author

@demeritcowboy good catch! I just made the change. I considered using the 'count' argument, but I think: Clicks: 1 and Clicks: 2 reads more smoothly than: Click: 1 and Clicks: 2, right?

@demeritcowboy
Copy link
Contributor

Going to ignore the infra test fails since it passed crm and api3 which is where any likely tests would be.

@demeritcowboy demeritcowboy merged commit b3092bb into civicrm:master Mar 2, 2024
2 of 3 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants