Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

dev/core#4554 Delete related Queue when user job deleted #28051

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 8, 2023

Conversation

eileenmcnaughton
Copy link
Contributor

Overview

dev/core#4554 Delete related Queue when user job deleted

Before

Per https://lab.civicrm.org/dev/core/-/issues/4554 deleting the UserJob without the corresponding Queue record can cause errors

After

Queue deleted when the job is

Technical Details

This is a regression albeit not that recent - I'm not sure why it hasn't been hit more - there must be mitigating factors

Comments

@wmortada

Copy link

civibot bot commented Nov 8, 2023

🤖 Thank you for contributing to CiviCRM! ❤️ We will need to test and review this PR. 👷

Introduction for new contributors...
  • If this is your first PR, an admin will greenlight automated testing with the command ok to test or add to whitelist.
  • A series of tests will automatically run. You can see the results at the bottom of this page (if there are any problems, it will include a link to see what went wrong).
  • A demo site will be built where anyone can try out a version of CiviCRM that includes your changes.
  • If this process needs to be repeated, an admin will issue the command test this please to rerun tests and build a new demo site.
  • Before this PR can be merged, it needs to be reviewed. Please keep in mind that reviewers are volunteers, and their response time can vary from a few hours to a few weeks depending on their availability and their knowledge of this particular part of CiviCRM.
  • A great way to speed up this process is to "trade reviews" with someone - find an open PR that you feel able to review, and leave a comment like "I'm reviewing this now, could you please review mine?" (include a link to yours). You don't have to wait for a response to get started (and you don't have to stop at one!) the more you review, the faster this process goes for everyone 😄
  • To ensure that you are credited properly in the final release notes, please add yourself to contributor-key.yml
  • For more information about contributing, see CONTRIBUTING.md.
Quick links for reviewers...

➡️ Online demo of this PR 🔗

@civibot civibot bot added the 5.68 label Nov 8, 2023
Copy link

civibot bot commented Nov 8, 2023

The issue associated with the Pull Request can be viewed at https://lab.civicrm.org/dev/core/-/issues/4554

@eileenmcnaughton
Copy link
Contributor Author

test this please

@demeritcowboy demeritcowboy merged commit 75f4f7e into civicrm:5.68 Nov 8, 2023
@demeritcowboy
Copy link
Contributor

For "mitigating factors", I don't get the reported error it just seems to re-use the existing queue entry. But this doesn't seem to hurt anything.

@wmortada
Copy link
Contributor

wmortada commented Nov 8, 2023

Thanks @eileenmcnaughton. I appreciate you working on this. I will check to see if this fixes the original issue when I get a chance.

@eileenmcnaughton eileenmcnaughton deleted the import_568 branch November 8, 2023 19:58
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants