Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix Participant form test to correctly test html version #27763

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 10, 2023

Conversation

eileenmcnaughton
Copy link
Contributor

We were checking for text that is present on the text version - but not the html. This blanks out the text version in the test (soon to be global) so that we are testing the html version

In this case the html version is right - ie we only show paid amount & balance if relevant - ie if part payment has been made. If it is all paid or all unpaid we don't

We were checking for text that is present on the text version - but not the html.

In this case the html version is right - ie we only show paid amount & balance if
relevant  - ie if part payment has been made. If it is all paid or all unpaid we don't
@civibot
Copy link

civibot bot commented Oct 9, 2023

🤖 Thank you for contributing to CiviCRM! ❤️ We will need to test and review this PR. 👷

Introduction for new contributors...
  • If this is your first PR, an admin will greenlight automated testing with the command ok to test or add to whitelist.
  • A series of tests will automatically run. You can see the results at the bottom of this page (if there are any problems, it will include a link to see what went wrong).
  • A demo site will be built where anyone can try out a version of CiviCRM that includes your changes.
  • If this process needs to be repeated, an admin will issue the command test this please to rerun tests and build a new demo site.
  • Before this PR can be merged, it needs to be reviewed. Please keep in mind that reviewers are volunteers, and their response time can vary from a few hours to a few weeks depending on their availability and their knowledge of this particular part of CiviCRM.
  • A great way to speed up this process is to "trade reviews" with someone - find an open PR that you feel able to review, and leave a comment like "I'm reviewing this now, could you please review mine?" (include a link to yours). You don't have to wait for a response to get started (and you don't have to stop at one!) the more you review, the faster this process goes for everyone 😄
  • To ensure that you are credited properly in the final release notes, please add yourself to contributor-key.yml
  • For more information about contributing, see CONTRIBUTING.md.
Quick links for reviewers...

➡️ Online demo of this PR 🔗

@civibot civibot bot added the master label Oct 9, 2023
@colemanw colemanw merged commit b6035a7 into civicrm:master Oct 10, 2023
@colemanw colemanw deleted the blank_text branch October 10, 2023 19:38
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants