Standardise fee_label in event workflow messages

[eileenmcnaughton]

We already fixed it to the token in
the online template so make offline & test ones match

e90b263#diff-2652c5ed241e0c2a68dc79d97ce2b6056ad2bc8ce37aee9bce8dd69678a160a8R187

[civibot]

🤖 Thank you for contributing to CiviCRM! ❤️ We will need to test and review this PR. 👷

Introduction for new contributors...

• If this is your first PR, an admin will greenlight automated testing with the command ok to test or add to whitelist.
• A series of tests will automatically run. You can see the results at the bottom of this page (if there are any problems, it will include a link to see what went wrong).
• A demo site will be built where anyone can try out a version of CiviCRM that includes your changes.
• If this process needs to be repeated, an admin will issue the command test this please to rerun tests and build a new demo site.
• Before this PR can be merged, it needs to be reviewed. Please keep in mind that reviewers are volunteers, and their response time can vary from a few hours to a few weeks depending on their availability and their knowledge of this particular part of CiviCRM.
• A great way to speed up this process is to "trade reviews" with someone - find an open PR that you feel able to review, and leave a comment like "I'm reviewing this now, could you please review mine?" (include a link to yours). You don't have to wait for a response to get started (and you don't have to stop at one!) the more you review, the faster this process goes for everyone 😄
• To ensure that you are credited properly in the final release notes, please add yourself to contributor-key.yml
• For more information about contributing, see CONTRIBUTING.md.

Quick links for reviewers...

• ➡️ PR Demo site (can be rebuilt with the command test this please).
• 📖 Review standards
• 🗒️ Review template (brief or verbose)

➡️ Online demo of this PR 🔗

[larssandergreen]

I gave this a try and am not getting anything coming through in any of the templates (with cache clearing).

[larssandergreen]

That includes the previous PR in 5.65, you can see in the PR after screenshots that the fee_level is missing, so we should probably backport whatever the fix is.

[eileenmcnaughton]

Yeah - I thought event fee was part of ... event. But it isn't - it's participant.fee_label I think...

[larssandergreen]

Should work as event.fee_label, it's listed in CRM_Event_Tokens - but it doesn't.

[eileenmcnaughton]

@larssandergreen yeah - but did that ever work or was it a mistake

[larssandergreen]

It's in the Event API

[eileenmcnaughton]

Sorry - yes it is

[larssandergreen]

It's just not in the list of exposed tokens, I'll put up a PR in a second.

[larssandergreen]

This should do it: #27372

[eileenmcnaughton]

Ok so ^^ is merged through now

[larssandergreen]

Yes, this one is good to merge now.