dev/core#2486 Add payment token api #19933
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
(Standard links)
|
|
@eileenmcnaughton test fail relates, looks like its mostly about missing a setUp process or something |
|
I think I got it @seamuslee001 |
I put up a merge request to edit in somewhere to link to https://lab.civicrm.org/documentation/docs/user-en/-/merge_requests/472 since I couldn't see anywhere that payment tokens were discussed
|
@colemanw @seamuslee001 this one should be all good now |
|
Nice. Another one to tick off https://lab.civicrm.org/dev/core/-/issues/2486 |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Overview
dev/core#2486 Add payment token api
Before
The void
After
tada
Technical Details
I put up a merge request to edit in somewhere to link to
https://lab.civicrm.org/documentation/docs/user-en/-/merge_requests/472 since I couldn't
see anywhere that payment tokens were discussed
Comments