Added conditional check so that it can be altered by hook

[pradpnayak]

Overview

Added conditional check for printing blocks so that it can be easily altered by hooks if we need to hide certain blocks from printing.

@demeritcowboy

[civibot]

(Standard links)

• If this is your first pull-request for CiviCRM, please browse CONTRIBUTING.md for information about the development and testing processes.
• If you are reviewing this pull-request, you may wish to consult the test sites and the Review Standards (long template, short template).

[demeritcowboy]

• General standards
  • [r-explain] Mostly PASS
    • It could mention that hook_civicrm_alterTemplateFile doesn't get called for this Report.tpl here, so you can't use that. You can customize CaseView.tpl though if you wanted to replace the Print Report link to use your own custom link. So two other approaches here then would be to make it either call hook_alterTemplateFile or make it easier to alter the print report link, but they might be more work.
  • [r-user] PASS
  • [r-doc] PASS
  • [r-run] PASS
• Developer standards
  • [r-tech] PASS
    • A more general approach to customizing might be better long-term, but this change doesn't prevent that.
  • [r-code] PASS
    • It's mostly indentation changes. It's just adding in if statements that are similar to some that are already in the file for other sections.
  • [r-maint] PASS
  • [r-test] PASS

[pradpnayak]

@demeritcowboy Yes i agree, ATM no Page/Form hooks are invoked to alter the smarty variables. But for now i am using casetypes() and/or optionValues() hooks to alter the smarty variables. But i am thinking to add support for hook_civicrm_alterContent ().

[yashodha]

@demeritcowboy ready to merge or do you expect few changes in documentation etc?

[demeritcowboy]

No there's nothing new to document. Seems fine to me.

[yashodha]

@demeritcowboy ok, merging this PR as per your review.