Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Attempted test fix #13791

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 12, 2019
Merged

Attempted test fix #13791

merged 1 commit into from
Mar 12, 2019

Conversation

eileenmcnaughton
Copy link
Contributor

Overview

Attempt to fix false negative test fail

Before

inappropriate intermittent fails

After

Maybe not?

Technical Details

This revert test has started failing frequently. It's possible the reason is performance
Improvements, resulting ineffectively no change in time between the entries.

I's also possible the issue is with the timestamp being used but I think that has
a permitted variance

Comments

@civibot
Copy link

civibot bot commented Mar 8, 2019

(Standard links)

@civibot civibot bot added the master label Mar 8, 2019
This revert test has started failing frequently. It's possible the reason is performance
Improvements, resulting ineffectively no change in time between the entries.

I's also possible the issue is with the timestamp being used but I think that has
a permitted variance
@mattwire
Copy link
Contributor

@eileenmcnaughton Do you think this change resolved this issue? If so, then go ahead and merge - it's a change in a test and won't make things any worse.

@eileenmcnaughton eileenmcnaughton merged commit 1c7e284 into civicrm:master Mar 12, 2019
@eileenmcnaughton eileenmcnaughton deleted the revert branch March 12, 2019 20:23
@eileenmcnaughton
Copy link
Contributor Author

@mattwire TBH I don't know - but the only way to find out is to merge & see if the false fails reduce

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants