-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 825
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
(dev/core#217) PrevNext - Use more consistent cache-keys while adjusting filters #12663
(dev/core#217) PrevNext - Use more consistent cache-keys while adjusting filters #12663
Conversation
…ing filters Suppose you run a search ("Find Contact", "Advanced Search", "Custom Search", etc). The result screen includes several elements (which we'll reference below): 1. Standard pagination (Previous/Next; First/Last; Jump-To) 2. Numerical option for page-size 3. Sortable columns 4. An alphabetical filter 5. Checkboxes As you work with these options, the content of the `civicrm_prevnext_cache` table may change. This patch does not substantively change what's in that cache, but makes the column `cacheKey` simpler and more consistent. Both Before and After (Unchanged) --------------------------------- * The form's qfKey identifies the current screen/filters/cache. * If you navigate to the next/previous page (`#1`) or adjust the page-size (`#2`), the content in `civicrm_prevnext_cache` remains the same (for the given qfKey). * If you change the sort column (`civicrm#3`) or alphabetic filter (`civicrm#4`), the content in `civicrm_prevnext_cache` is deleted and repopulated (for the given qfKey). * If you toggle a checkbox, the `civicrm_prevnext_cache.is_selected` property updates accordingly. These selections are retained when changing pages (`#1`/`#2`), but they're reset if you use sort or alphabet options (`civicrm#3`/`civicrm#4`). Before ------ * The content of `civicrm_prevnext_cache.cacheKey` takes one of two forms, depending on whether you're using an alphabetic filter (`civicrm#4`). * `civicrm search {qfKey}` (typical, without any alphabetic filter) * `civicrm search {qfKey}_alphabet` (less common, with an alphabetic filter) * The queries which read or delete the query-cache use a prefix+wildcard, i.e. `WHERE cacheKey LIKE 'civicrm search {qfKey}%'`. After ----- * The content of `civicrm_prevnext_cache.cacheKey` takes only one form * `civicrm search {qfKey}` * The queries which read or delete the query-cache use an exact match, i.e. `WHERE cacheKey = 'civicrm search {qfKey}'`.` * The text `_alphabet` does not appear in the PHP source folders (CRM, Civi, bin, api, extern, tests). Comments -------- In theory, one can imagine that it's desireable to keep the cached results for each of the sorted/filtered variants of the query. That might allow the user to quickly switch among different sortings and different alphabetic-filters, or it might allow some kind of clever management of the selections. But this is not so. As we see (both before and after), the substance of the cache is deleted whenever the user changes `civicrm#3`/`civicrm#4`. In reality, one user browsing a search screen corresponds to exactly one query-cache. As near as I can tell, the old code made the names change for no real reason at all. To observe the behavior empirically, I would twiddle the UI widgets and concurrently inspect the content of the cache tables. For example: ``` mysql> select group_name, path, FROM_BASE64(data), expired_date from civicrm_cache where path like 'civicrm search%'; select 'Total records in' as label, cacheKey, count(*), min(id), max(id) from civicrm_prevnext_cache group by cacheKey union select 'Selected records in ', cacheKey, count(*), min(id), max(id) from civicrm_prevnext_cache where is_selected=1 group by cacheKey; +------------------------------+------------------------------------------------------+--------------------------------------------------------------+--------------+ | group_name | path | FROM_BASE64(data) | expired_date | +------------------------------+------------------------------------------------------+--------------------------------------------------------------+--------------+ | CiviCRM Search PrevNextCache | civicrm search a8ed1e2039241c41457a88f65aa8a8ee_7845 | s:52:"civicrm search a8ed1e2039241c41457a88f65aa8a8ee_7845"; | NULL | +------------------------------+------------------------------------------------------+--------------------------------------------------------------+--------------+ 1 row in set (0.00 sec) +----------------------+------------------------------------------------------+----------+---------+---------+ | label | cacheKey | count(*) | min(id) | max(id) | +----------------------+------------------------------------------------------+----------+---------+---------+ | Total records in | civicrm search a8ed1e2039241c41457a88f65aa8a8ee_7845 | 6 | 787 | 792 | | Selected records in | civicrm search a8ed1e2039241c41457a88f65aa8a8ee_7845 | 1 | 789 | 789 | +----------------------+------------------------------------------------------+----------+---------+---------+ 2 rows in set (0.01 sec) ```
(Standard links)
|
@@ -97,37 +97,37 @@ public function markSelection($cacheKey, $action, $cIds = NULL) { | |||
if (is_array($cIds)) { | |||
$cIdFilter = "(" . implode(',', $cIds) . ")"; | |||
$whereClause = " | |||
WHERE cacheKey LIKE %1 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I confirmed that where the cacheKey is passed to this function it is always qfKey from the url - which is either the qfKey or 'civicrm search ' + $('input[name=qfKey]'
I went through the code & it makes sense but I'm struggling to r-run it because markSelection is not working for me on master - with or without this patch. (I switched back from Redis to ArrayCache & same deal - I am seeing some js errors & I'm not seeing any entries in the prevnext after a basic contact search with no params) |
Ok I rebuild my dmaster & applied this & markSelection is working now in Redis and in ArrayCache mode. I did a basic search & export & also checked CiviRules custom search still works (which was an issue on one attempt to rationalise this code) |
Suppose you run a search ("Find Contact", "Advanced Search", "Custom Search", etc). The result screen includes several elements (which we'll reference below):
As you work with these options, the content of the
civicrm_prevnext_cache
table may change. This patch does not substantively change what's in that cache, but makes the columncacheKey
simpler and more consistent.Providing more consistent cache-keys makes it easier to define a straight-forward contract for swappable PrevNextCache implementations (dev/core#217).
Both Before and After (Unchanged)
#1
) or adjust the page-size (#2
), the content incivicrm_prevnext_cache
remains the same (for the given qfKey).#3
) or alphabetic filter (#4
), the content incivicrm_prevnext_cache
is deleted and repopulated (for the given qfKey).civicrm_prevnext_cache.is_selected
property updates accordingly. These selections are retained when changing pages (#1
/#2
), but they're reset if you use sort or alphabet options (#3
/#4
).Before
civicrm_prevnext_cache.cacheKey
takes one of two forms, depending on whether you're using an alphabetic filter (#4
).civicrm search {qfKey}
(typical, without any alphabetic filter)civicrm search {qfKey}_alphabet
(less common, with an alphabetic filter)WHERE cacheKey LIKE 'civicrm search {qfKey}%'
.After
civicrm_prevnext_cache.cacheKey
takes only one formcivicrm search {qfKey}
WHERE cacheKey = 'civicrm search {qfKey}'
.`_alphabet
does not appear in the PHP source folders (CRM, Civi, bin, api, extern, tests).Comments
In theory, one can imagine ways the old behavior is desireable -- one might keep the cached results for each of the sorted/filtered variants of the query. That might allow the user to quickly switch among different sortings and different alphabetic-filters, or it might allow some kind of clever management of the selections. But this is not so. As we see (both before and after), the substance of the cache is deleted whenever the user changes
#3
/#4
. In reality, one user browsing a search screen corresponds to exactly one query-cache. As near as I can tell, the old code changed the names for no real reason at all.To observe the behavior empirically, I would run a search, twiddle the UI widgets, and concurrently inspect the content of the PrevNext cache tables. For example: